This report offers a deep-dive into Docebo Inc. (DCBO), a company at the crossroads of achieved profitability and slowing momentum in the human capital software space. Our analysis, updated on January 10, 2026, scrutinizes Docebo's financials, competitive moat, and future growth, benchmarking it against peers like Workday to deliver a clear fair value estimate and actionable insights.
Docebo presents a mixed investment case. The company is financially healthy, consistently profitable, and has a strong debt-free balance sheet. Its stock also appears undervalued after a significant price decline. However, a sharp slowdown in revenue growth is a primary concern. The business also struggles to increase spending from existing customers. This creates a conflict between its solid financials and an uncertain growth outlook. Investors should weigh the attractive valuation against these significant growth risks.
US: NASDAQ
Docebo Inc. operates a cloud-based, artificial intelligence (AI)-powered Learning Management System (LMS) designed to help businesses manage, deliver, and measure corporate e-learning. The company's business model is centered on a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) framework, where customers pay recurring subscription fees for access to its platform. This model provides a predictable and stable revenue stream, with subscription revenue accounting for over 94% of its total TTM revenue of 236.69M. Docebo primarily targets mid-market and large enterprise customers across various industries that need to train employees, customers, and partners. The platform is designed to be a central hub for all learning activities, moving beyond the traditional role of an LMS to become a more dynamic and engaging learning suite. Its go-to-market strategy involves both direct sales teams focused on larger enterprises and partnerships to reach a broader audience, with a significant presence in North America, which generates over 74% of its revenue.
The core of Docebo's offering is its 'Docebo Learn' LMS, which forms the foundation of its product suite and is responsible for the vast majority of its revenue. This platform enables organizations to create, manage, and deliver training content, track learner progress, and generate reports. The global corporate e-learning market is estimated to be worth over $200 billion and is projected to grow at a CAGR of over 10%, providing a large addressable market. However, this space is intensely competitive, featuring established giants like Cornerstone OnDemand, SAP Litmos, and Workday Learning, as well as numerous smaller, specialized vendors. Docebo competes by focusing on user experience, ease of use, and a robust set of integrations. Customers are typically Learning & Development (L&D) or Human Resources departments within enterprises. The stickiness of the Learn LMS is high; once a company has uploaded its proprietary content, integrated the platform with its HR systems (like Workday or Oracle), and trained thousands of employees on it, the financial and operational costs of switching to a competitor are substantial. This creates a powerful moat based on high switching costs, which is crucial for long-term customer retention.
A key pillar of Docebo's competitive strategy and moat is its pervasive use of Artificial Intelligence across its platform. This isn't a standalone product but a feature layer that enhances the entire learning experience, contributing to the overall subscription revenue. Features include AI-powered content curation that automatically suggests relevant courses to users, a virtual coach that helps learners discover new skills, and auto-tagging of content to make it more discoverable. This focus on AI differentiates Docebo from more traditional, compliance-focused LMS platforms, positioning it as a more innovative and engaging solution. The market for AI in education and corporate training is a rapidly expanding sub-segment. While competitors are also racing to add AI capabilities, Docebo has built its brand around this technology, giving it a perceived edge. For customers, these AI features increase user engagement and the platform's overall value, making it even more integrated into their talent development strategy. This technological differentiation, while not permanent, strengthens its brand and enhances the platform's stickiness by making the user experience more personalized and effective.
Docebo also drives growth and deepens its moat through its 'Extended Enterprise' learning solutions, which allow companies to train external audiences like customers, partners, and resellers. This capability significantly expands the platform's use case beyond internal employee training and contributes to larger deal sizes and higher revenue per customer, as evidenced by the average contract value rising to 62.80K. The market for customer and partner education platforms is another high-growth area, as businesses recognize the value of well-trained external stakeholders for product adoption and channel sales. Competitors in this space include specialized platforms like Thought Industries and Skilljar. Docebo's advantage lies in offering a single, unified platform that can serve both internal and external learning needs, reducing complexity and total cost of ownership for its clients. This creates a network effect of sorts within the client's ecosystem and further raises switching costs, as the platform becomes embedded in both internal HR processes and external revenue-generating activities. This multi-pronged approach helps Docebo capture a larger share of a customer's technology budget and makes its platform more strategically important.
In conclusion, Docebo's business model is robust, anchored by a highly recurring revenue stream and a product that benefits from significant customer switching costs. Its strategic focus on a user-friendly, AI-driven experience has allowed it to build a strong brand and effectively compete against larger, incumbent players. The platform's ability to serve both internal and external learning needs provides a compelling value proposition and a clear path for expanding its wallet share within its customer base. This creates a defensible, albeit not impenetrable, competitive moat.
The primary vulnerability for Docebo is the fierce and ever-evolving competitive landscape of the learning technology industry. Large HCM suite providers like Workday and Oracle can bundle learning modules with their core HR platforms at a discount, while a myriad of innovative startups continue to emerge with niche solutions. Docebo's ability to maintain its competitive edge hinges on its capacity for continuous innovation, particularly in the realm of AI. Furthermore, while its platform is sticky, a Net Revenue Retention rate of 100% in its last reported fiscal year suggests that growth from its existing customer base is not as strong as that of elite SaaS companies. This indicates that while customers are not leaving in droves, the company may be facing challenges in upselling new modules or securing price increases, potentially due to competitive pressures. This makes the business resilient but suggests that its long-term success requires flawless execution in both product development and sales.
Docebo's current financial health is robust. The company is profitable, reporting a net income of $6.11 million in its most recent quarter (Q3 2025) and $22.57 million over the last twelve months. It is also generating real cash, with free cash flow (FCF) of $5.07 million in Q3, confirming that its earnings are backed by actual cash. The balance sheet is a major strength, featuring $66.13 million in cash against only $2.91 million in total debt, creating a very safe financial cushion. There are no signs of immediate financial stress; however, the slowing revenue growth rate is a key trend that warrants investor attention.
The income statement reveals a company that is not only growing but becoming more efficient. Revenue has continued to climb, reaching $61.62 million in Q3 2025. More importantly, profitability metrics are improving significantly. Gross margins remain high and stable at an elite 80.1%, indicating strong pricing power for its software. The operating margin has expanded impressively from 8.72% in fiscal year 2024 to 13.38% in the latest quarter. This demonstrates operating leverage, where profits grow faster than revenue as the business scales. For investors, this trend shows disciplined cost control and suggests that the business model is becoming increasingly profitable.
An analysis of cash flow confirms the quality of Docebo's earnings. For the full fiscal year 2024, cash from operations (CFO) of $29.25 million was greater than net income of $26.74 million, a positive sign of efficient cash conversion. In the most recent quarter, CFO was slightly below net income ($5.29 million vs. $6.11 million), which was caused by a negative change in working capital. This was partly due to a decrease in deferred revenue, which represents customer prepayments. While the company's large deferred revenue balance of $80.06 million is a strength, a decline in this figure can sometimes be a leading indicator of slowing new sales, making it an important metric to watch.
The company's balance sheet is exceptionally resilient. With $66.13 million in cash and minimal debt of $2.91 million, Docebo has a net cash position of over $63 million. Its liquidity is solid, with a current ratio of 1.13, meaning it has $1.13 in short-term assets for every dollar of short-term liabilities. This position is even stronger considering that a large part of its current liabilities ($80.06 million) is deferred revenue, which is a non-cash obligation. With a debt-to-equity ratio of just 0.06, the company relies almost entirely on equity and its own cash generation to fund operations. Overall, the balance sheet is very safe and provides substantial flexibility for future investments or weathering economic downturns.
Docebo's cash flow engine appears both dependable and efficient. Operating cash flow has been consistently positive, providing the necessary funds for the business to operate and invest. Capital expenditures are minimal, as is typical for a software company, amounting to just $0.22 million in the last quarter. This low capital intensity allows most of the operating cash flow to be converted into free cash flow (FCF). The company is primarily using this FCF to return capital to shareholders through stock buybacks ($3.4 million in Q3 and a substantial $34.21 million in Q2), which reduces the number of shares outstanding and can help boost earnings per share.
Regarding capital allocation, Docebo is focused on rewarding shareholders through share repurchases rather than dividends. The company does not pay a dividend. Instead, it has been actively buying back its own stock, causing shares outstanding to decline from 30.26 million at the end of 2024 to 28.73 million by the end of Q3 2025. This is a tax-efficient way to return capital and shows management's confidence in the stock's value. These buybacks are funded sustainably through internally generated cash flow, not by taking on debt, which is a prudent and positive capital management strategy.
In summary, Docebo’s financial foundation is stable, but the growth story is moderating. The key strengths are its pristine balance sheet with $63.22 million in net cash, its high and stable gross margins above 80%, and its clear demonstration of operating leverage as margins expand. The primary red flag is the clear deceleration in year-over-year revenue growth, which has fallen from 19.96% to 11.16% over the past year. A second, related risk to monitor is the recent negative change in working capital tied to deferred revenue. Overall, the company's financial position looks solid and low-risk, but its valuation will likely depend on its ability to stabilize or re-accelerate its top-line growth.
Over the past five years, Docebo has undergone a significant business model transition, which is clearly reflected in its financial performance. A comparison of its 5-year and 3-year trends reveals a story of slowing top-line growth but rapidly improving profitability. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) for revenue was approximately 36% over the five fiscal years ending in 2024. However, looking at the more recent 3-year period, the revenue CAGR slowed to about 23%, with the latest fiscal year's growth at 19.96%. This indicates a clear deceleration in customer acquisition or expansion momentum as the company and its market mature.
Conversely, the trend in profitability has been exceptionally positive. Five years ago, Docebo was posting significant operating losses, with an operating margin of -9.3% in fiscal 2020. This trend continued with a -12.45% margin in 2021. However, the company has since demonstrated powerful operating leverage. The operating margin improved to 0.38% in 2023 and reached a solid 8.72% in fiscal 2024. Similarly, free cash flow (FCF) has shown a remarkable turnaround. After being negative in 2021 (-$4.4 million), FCF has become consistently positive and has grown substantially, reaching $15.33 million in 2023 and $28 million in 2024. This pivot from burning cash to generating it is a key milestone in the company's history.
The income statement tells a clear story of this strategic shift. While the rapid revenue growth of earlier years (e.g., 65.68% in 2021) has moderated, the quality of that revenue has improved. Gross margins have remained consistently high and stable at around 80%, which is a hallmark of a strong software business. The primary driver of profitability has been disciplined management of operating expenses relative to revenue. This scaling efficiency turned the company's bottom line around, with net income swinging from a loss of -$13.6 million in 2021 to a profit of $26.74 million in 2024. The corresponding earnings per share (EPS) followed suit, improving from -$0.41 to $0.88 over the same period, marking a significant achievement in financial maturation.
An analysis of the balance sheet reinforces this picture of increasing financial stability. Docebo has historically maintained very low levels of debt, with total debt at a negligible $1.5 million at the end of fiscal 2024 against a cash balance of $92.54 million. This results in a strong net cash position of $91.05 million, providing substantial financial flexibility. While the cash balance has decreased from its peak of over $215 million in 2021, a significant portion of this reduction was due to a large share repurchase program in 2023. Overall liquidity remains healthy, with a current ratio of 1.2. The financial risk profile has improved as the company is now self-funding its operations through internally generated cash flow, reducing its reliance on capital markets.
The cash flow statement confirms the company's newfound operational strength. Operating cash flow (CFO) has become robust, growing from -$3.25 million in 2021 to $29.25 million in 2024. Capital expenditures are minimal, a typical feature of an asset-light software model, which allows a high conversion of operating cash flow into free cash flow. In the most recent fiscal year, free cash flow of $28 million slightly exceeded net income of $26.74 million, which is often seen as an indicator of high-quality earnings. This consistent and growing cash generation is a critical pillar supporting the company's financial health.
Regarding capital actions, Docebo has not paid any dividends, which is standard for a technology company focused on growth. The company's approach to its share count has evolved over the past five years. In fiscal 2020 and 2021, shares outstanding increased significantly, rising from 29 million to 33 million (+13.6% in 2021 alone), indicating shareholder dilution, likely from stock-based compensation and capital raises to fund growth. However, this trend has reversed recently. In fiscal 2023, the company initiated a substantial share repurchase program amounting to $159.45 million. This, along with another $11.02 million in buybacks in fiscal 2024, has reduced the share count back down to 30 million.
From a shareholder's perspective, these capital allocation decisions appear to be increasingly aligned with creating per-share value. The initial dilution occurred during a period of heavy investment and unprofitability. Now that the business generates significant cash, management has pivoted to returning capital to shareholders via buybacks. This shift is beneficial, especially since per-share metrics like EPS have improved dramatically from negative to a positive $0.88. The buybacks help to accrete, or increase, this per-share value for the remaining shareholders. The use of internally generated cash for repurchases, while maintaining a debt-free balance sheet, suggests a disciplined and shareholder-friendly approach to capital allocation in its current, more mature phase.
In conclusion, Docebo's historical record supports confidence in its ability to execute a challenging strategic pivot. The performance has been choppy, marked by a period of aggressive, cash-burning growth followed by a period of slower growth but rapidly improving financial discipline. The single biggest historical strength is the company's demonstrated ability to achieve significant operating leverage and generate strong, sustainable free cash flow. Its primary weakness has been the sharp deceleration in revenue growth and the high volatility of its stock, which reflects the market's uncertainty during this transition. The past performance shows a company that has successfully matured but now faces the challenge of balancing profitability with reigniting growth.
The corporate learning technology landscape is undergoing a significant transformation, moving away from a compliance-centric, 'check-the-box' mentality towards a strategic focus on continuous upskilling, reskilling, and talent development. Over the next 3-5 years, this shift will accelerate, driven by several key factors. First, the rapid advancement of AI and automation is creating urgent skills gaps within organizations, forcing them to invest in training to keep their workforce relevant. Second, high employee turnover and the war for talent are pushing companies to use learning and development (L&D) as a tool for retention and engagement. Third, technology itself is changing how learning is delivered, with a move towards AI-powered personalization, micro-learning, and integration directly into workflows via tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams. This is creating demand for more engaging and intelligent platforms like Docebo's.
The global corporate e-learning market is expected to grow at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of over 10%, reaching a value of several hundred billion dollars in the coming years. Catalysts for increased demand include the permanent shift to hybrid work models, which necessitates scalable digital training solutions, and the rise of the 'extended enterprise' model, where companies invest in training customers and partners to drive product adoption and sales. Despite these tailwinds, competitive intensity is expected to remain high. Large Human Capital Management (HCM) providers like Workday and Oracle can bundle their learning modules at a discount, making it difficult for standalone vendors to compete on price. At the same time, a plethora of venture-backed startups are entering the market with niche solutions. For Docebo to thrive, it must continue to innovate, particularly in AI, and demonstrate a clear return on investment to its customers.
Docebo's primary offering is its core Learning Management System (LMS), 'Docebo Learn,' for internal employee training. Currently, this product is used by HR and L&D departments for foundational tasks like employee onboarding, compliance training, and professional development. Consumption is often limited by corporate L&D budgets, the significant effort required to integrate the LMS with core HR systems like Workday or SAP, and the challenge of driving user engagement with training content. Over the next 3-5 years, consumption is expected to increase significantly in the area of strategic upskilling and reskilling for critical job roles. In contrast, usage for static, one-time compliance courses may represent a smaller portion of growth. The most significant shift will be towards learning that is embedded in the flow of work, delivered through integrations with collaboration tools. Catalysts for this growth include pressure on companies to close internal skills gaps and the need to offer compelling development opportunities to retain top talent. Docebo's main competitors for this use case are Cornerstone OnDemand, a large, feature-rich specialist, and the learning modules from HCM giants like Workday and SAP. Customers often choose based on their existing technology stack; a company heavily invested in Workday may default to Workday Learning for seamless integration. Docebo's path to outperforming is by winning customers who prioritize a superior, AI-driven user experience over a bundled, 'good enough' solution. The number of LMS providers is consolidating at the high end but expanding with niche players at the low end, a trend likely to continue. A key risk for Docebo is the high probability of losing deals to these larger HCM bundles, which would compress pricing and limit new customer adoption.
A major growth driver for Docebo is its 'Extended Enterprise' solution, which enables companies to train external audiences like customers, partners, and resellers. Today, this is used by marketing and sales enablement teams to improve product adoption, reduce customer support costs, and accelerate channel sales. Consumption is currently limited by the complexity of creating and managing content for diverse external groups and integrating the platform with CRM systems like Salesforce. Looking ahead, this segment is poised for rapid growth. Businesses are increasingly recognizing that a well-educated customer is more likely to be successful and renew their subscription, making customer education a strategic priority. Consumption will increase as more companies launch formal certification programs for customers and partners. The market for customer and partner education platforms is a high-growth niche, with specialized competitors like Skilljar and Thought Industries. Customers in this segment prioritize e-commerce capabilities, robust analytics, and deep CRM integration. Docebo's competitive advantage is its ability to offer a single, unified platform for both internal and external training, which appeals to customers looking to simplify their tech stack. This is reflected in Docebo's rising Average Contract Value, which recently hit $62.80K. The primary risk in this domain is the high probability of competition from specialist vendors who may offer deeper, more targeted functionality for specific use cases, potentially winning over customers with very specific needs that Docebo's all-in-one platform cannot meet as effectively.
Underpinning Docebo's entire platform is its use of Artificial Intelligence, which serves as a key technological differentiator. This is not a standalone product but an integrated feature layer designed to enhance the learning experience through personalized content recommendations, automated content tagging, and a virtual coaching assistant. Current consumption is inherently tied to overall platform usage and is limited by the quality of a client's data and a user's trust in AI-driven suggestions. Over the next 3-5 years, AI's role will evolve from personalization to creation. The emergence of generative AI presents a massive opportunity to automate the creation of course materials, quizzes, and summaries, which could dramatically reduce the cost and time required for content development. This shift will make AI a 'table stakes' feature for any competitive LMS. The market for AI in education and corporate training is projected to grow at a CAGR of over 30%. While Docebo has built its brand on AI, every major competitor is now aggressively investing in this area. To win, Docebo must translate its AI capabilities into tangible business outcomes for clients, such as faster onboarding or demonstrable skill improvements. The risk here is medium probability: if competitors rapidly close the AI feature gap, Docebo's primary differentiator would be eroded, forcing it to compete more directly on price and other features, potentially slowing growth.
Finally, Docebo's integration capabilities, marketed as 'Docebo Connect,' are crucial for embedding the platform into a customer's existing technology ecosystem. This product allows Docebo to connect with hundreds of third-party applications, including HR systems, CRMs, and content libraries. Current consumption is highest among larger enterprise customers who require seamless data flows between their core business systems. Usage is limited by the availability of pre-built connectors and the technical resources needed to configure them. In the next 3-5 years, the demand for deep, reliable integrations will only increase. Customers will expect the learning platform to be an invisible, integrated part of their daily workflow, not a separate destination. The ability to provide robust integrations with essential platforms like Microsoft Teams, Salesforce, and Workday is a critical factor in enterprise buying decisions. While Docebo offers a strong library of integrations, so do its key competitors. The competitive battleground here is the quality, reliability, and ease of use of these connections. A medium-probability risk for Docebo is its dependency on the APIs of its technology partners. If a major partner like Microsoft were to make significant changes to its APIs, Docebo's integrations could break, causing major disruptions for customers and damaging its reputation for reliability.
Beyond specific products, Docebo's future growth hinges on its go-to-market execution, particularly its ability to continue moving upmarket and winning larger enterprise deals. The growth in customers paying over $100k annually to 492 is a strong positive indicator. However, this must be paired with a strategy to improve monetization from the existing customer base. The last reported Net Revenue Retention Rate of 100% is a major red flag, indicating that revenue gains from customer upgrades are being entirely canceled out by losses from churn and downgrades. For a SaaS company, this suggests a 'leaky bucket' that makes growth inefficient, as it must rely solely on new customer acquisition. Addressing this metric by improving upselling and cross-selling motions is the single most critical challenge for the company's long-term growth narrative. Without improvement here, sustaining double-digit growth will become increasingly difficult and expensive.
As of early 2026, Docebo trades near the bottom of its 52-week range with a market cap around $632 million, reflecting significant negative sentiment. Key valuation metrics, such as a forward P/E of ~17.3x and an EV/Sales multiple of 2.4x, appear modest for a profitable SaaS company. This market pricing is sharply at odds with Wall Street consensus, where 13 analysts have a median 12-month price target of $36.10, implying approximately 64% upside. While such targets carry uncertainty, the strong bullish consensus provides a compelling external signal that the stock may be undervalued.
An intrinsic valuation using a discounted cash flow (DCF) model reinforces this view, suggesting a fair value between $32 and $40. This model, based on conservative assumptions of 25% FCF growth and a 10-12% discount rate, indicates the market is not fully crediting Docebo for its transition to profitability and strong cash generation. Historically, the company's valuation multiples have also compressed significantly. Its current EV/Sales multiple of 2.4x is a fraction of its 3-year average of 6x-8x, and its P/E ratio is near a 5-year low. This contraction reflects the market's focus on slowing revenue growth, potentially overlooking the concurrent improvement in financial strength.
Compared to peers in the Human Capital Management space like Workday (EV/Sales 5.9x) and Paylocity (EV/Sales 5.2x), Docebo trades at a steep discount. Applying a conservative 4.0x EV/Sales multiple—still below the peer median—would imply a share price around $35, well above its current level. This valuation gap appears punitive given Docebo's strong balance sheet and niche leadership. Further reinforcing the undervaluation thesis is the company's shareholder yield. While it pays no dividend, a significant share buyback program, funded by growing free cash flow, delivers a strong return to shareholders and signals management's confidence in the stock's intrinsic value.
Triangulating these different valuation methods—analyst targets ($28-$46), intrinsic DCF value ($32-$40), and peer-based multiples (~$35)—consistently points to a fair value significantly higher than the current stock price. A final fair value range of $32.00 to $38.00 seems justified, with a midpoint of $35.00. This implies a potential upside of approximately 59%, leading to the conclusion that Docebo is currently undervalued, with the primary risk being a failure to maintain its trajectory of margin expansion and stable growth.
Warren Buffett would likely view Docebo Inc. as a promising but unproven business that falls outside his circle of competence and strict investment criteria in 2025. He would acknowledge the company's impressive revenue growth, currently around 25% annually, and its strong, debt-free balance sheet, which are attractive qualities. However, the investment thesis would falter on his core requirements: a long-term, durable competitive moat and a history of predictable, robust earnings. Docebo's moat, built on being a 'best-of-breed' learning platform, is constantly under threat from giants like Oracle and SAP who can bundle 'good enough' learning modules into their essential enterprise suites at little extra cost. Furthermore, Docebo's recent shift to profitability is too new to provide the decades of predictable cash flow data Buffett requires, making its valuation based on an EV/to-Sales multiple of ~5x appear speculative rather than a bargain with a margin of safety. Management currently reinvests all cash back into the business to fuel growth, which is appropriate for its stage but means no shareholder returns via dividends or buybacks, which Buffett often favors in mature companies. If forced to choose in this sector, Buffett would favor behemoths like Oracle (ORCL) for its fortress-like database moat and ~20x P/E ratio or SAP (SAP) for its deep enterprise integration and consistent profitability, as both offer the predictability he prizes. Buffett would likely only reconsider Docebo after a decade of consistent, high free cash flow generation and a significant price decline that offers a clear margin of safety. As a high-growth technology platform with a premium valuation and maturing cash flows, Docebo does not fit classic value criteria; while it could be a long-term winner, it sits outside Buffett’s value framework.
Charlie Munger would approach Docebo with extreme caution, viewing it as a high-quality small business swimming in a shark tank. He would admire its strong revenue growth of ~25%, excellent gross margins around ~81%, and a clean balance sheet with net cash, recognizing these as signs of a sound operation. However, his primary focus would be on the durability of its competitive advantage, which he would find questionable against giants like SAP, Workday, and Oracle, who can bundle a 'good enough' learning module into their indispensable enterprise suites. While Docebo's ~104% net revenue retention is good, Munger would worry that this moat is not deep or wide enough to fend off competitors who are already deeply entrenched in their customers' operations. For Munger, the risk of being commoditized by a larger player is a form of 'stupidity' to be avoided, leading him to likely pass on the investment despite its attractive growth. He would prefer to own the 'sharks' themselves, such as SAP or Workday, citing their fortress-like moats and predictable cash flows as far more aligned with his principles. A potential change in his view would require overwhelming evidence that Docebo's platform is becoming an indispensable industry standard that even the largest enterprises cannot ignore.
Bill Ackman would view Docebo in 2025 as a high-quality, fast-growing business operating in the attractive software-as-a-service (SaaS) industry, characterized by recurring revenues and high gross margins of around 81%. He would be encouraged by its strong net cash balance sheet and its recent shift to profitability, indicating operational discipline. However, Ackman's primary concern would be the durability of Docebo's competitive moat. As a 'best-of-breed' learning platform, it faces immense long-term pressure from integrated HCM giants like Workday and Oracle, who can bundle 'good enough' learning modules into their enterprise-wide suites, potentially capping Docebo's pricing power and market share. For retail investors, Ackman would likely conclude that while Docebo is a strong company, its position is not as dominant or unassailable as the fortress-like businesses he prefers to own for the long term, making the risk-reward proposition uncertain.
Docebo Inc. operates as a key innovator within the competitive landscape of learning and talent development software. The company primarily competes on two fronts: against other specialized, 'best-of-breed' Learning Management System (LMS) providers, and against the colossal, all-in-one Human Capital Management (HCM) platforms offered by software titans such as Workday, Oracle, and SAP. While the HCM giants offer learning as just one module in a sprawling suite of HR tools, Docebo's focus is entirely on creating a superior, dedicated learning experience. This singular focus allows for deeper innovation and a more agile response to the evolving needs of corporate training and employee development.
The core of Docebo's competitive strategy lies in its technology. The platform is built on a modern, cloud-native architecture and heavily incorporates artificial intelligence to personalize learning paths, automate administrative tasks, and provide deeper analytics on learning effectiveness. This technological edge is its main selling point, attracting enterprise and mid-market customers who view employee development as a critical business function rather than a back-office chore. This focus has translated into impressive top-line growth, with revenue consistently growing at rates that outpace the broader market and its larger, more mature competitors, as evidenced by its recent year-over-year growth of around 25%.
However, Docebo's specialized focus comes with significant challenges. The largest risk stems from the immense scale and market power of the integrated HCM providers. These giants can leverage their existing customer relationships and bundle their learning modules with other essential services like payroll and core HR, often at a substantial discount. This creates intense pricing pressure and can make it difficult for Docebo to win deals where the buyer prioritizes vendor consolidation and a single, integrated system over the quality of the learning tool. As a smaller player with a market capitalization of around $1 billion, Docebo lacks the vast financial resources, global salesforce, and brand recognition of multi-hundred-billion-dollar competitors.
Ultimately, Docebo's competitive position is that of a high-growth disruptor. Its future success depends on its ability to maintain its technological lead, particularly in AI, and effectively communicate the return on investment of a superior learning platform. The company must continue to win over customers who are willing to invest in a specialized solution rather than settling for the 'good enough' module within their existing HR system. Its path to long-term success involves solidifying its leadership in the corporate learning niche while proving it can sustain profitable growth in the face of competition from some of the largest software companies in the world.
Workday represents a formidable competitor to Docebo, not as a direct learning specialist, but as a dominant provider of integrated Human Capital Management (HCM) suites for large enterprises. While Docebo offers a specialized, best-in-class learning platform, Workday provides learning as one module within a comprehensive ecosystem that includes finance, HR, and payroll. This fundamental difference shapes their competitive dynamic: Docebo competes on feature depth and innovation in learning, whereas Workday competes on the power of its integrated platform, enterprise-wide data visibility, and vendor consolidation.
In terms of business and moat, Workday's is substantially wider and deeper. Its brand is a trusted name in the C-suite, with Gartner frequently ranking it as a leader in HCM suites. Switching costs are exceptionally high for Workday customers (net retention rates consistently above 95%), as replacing an entire HR and financial system is a monumental undertaking. Its scale is massive, serving over 10,000 organizations, including more than half of the Fortune 500, compared to Docebo's ~3,800 customers. While Docebo builds network effects through its content marketplace, Workday's network effects span the entire employee data ecosystem, creating a much stickier platform. Regulatory barriers around data privacy and payroll compliance also favor established, large-scale providers like Workday. Winner: Workday possesses a far superior business moat built on integration, scale, and switching costs.
From a financial standpoint, Workday is a much more mature and resilient business, though it grows more slowly. Workday's annual revenue exceeds $7 billion, dwarfing Docebo's roughly $200 million. Workday's revenue growth is slower but stable at ~17% TTM versus Docebo's ~25%. Workday's gross margins are lower at ~75% vs. Docebo's ~81%, but it generates significantly more free cash flow, with a TTM FCF margin of ~30%, which is a key sign of financial health and reinvestment capacity. Docebo is newly profitable on an adjusted basis and has a strong net cash position, giving it good liquidity. However, Workday's sheer scale of cash generation and proven profitability over a longer period makes its financial profile more robust. Winner: Workday is the clear winner on financial strength due to its massive cash flow and scale.
Analyzing past performance, Workday has delivered consistent, albeit moderating, growth and strong shareholder returns over the long term. Over the past five years, Workday has grown revenues at a CAGR of ~20%, while Docebo's growth has been higher at over 30% since its IPO. However, Workday's stock has been less volatile, exhibiting a lower beta. Docebo's stock, characteristic of a smaller growth company, has experienced much larger swings and a significant drawdown from its peak in 2021. For long-term, stable growth, Workday has a better track record. For explosive, albeit riskier, growth, Docebo has shown higher bursts. Winner: Workday for its consistent, large-scale execution and more stable shareholder returns over a longer period.
Looking at future growth, Docebo has a longer runway in its niche market. The corporate learning market is a large Total Addressable Market (TAM) where Docebo can still capture significant share. Its primary drivers are its AI innovation and ability to win 'best-of-breed' deals. Workday's growth stems from cross-selling new modules to its massive customer base and expanding its wallet share, including pushing its own learning module. Analyst consensus projects Docebo's revenue growth to remain in the 20-25% range, while Workday is expected to grow in the mid-teens (15-17%). Docebo has the edge on pure growth potential due to its smaller base and focused market. Winner: Docebo has a higher potential growth trajectory, though it comes with higher execution risk.
Valuation presents a trade-off between growth and size. Docebo trades at an EV/Sales multiple of around 5x, while Workday trades at a higher premium of around 7x. This premium for Workday reflects its market leadership, wider moat, and substantial free cash flow generation. An investor is paying more for each dollar of Workday's sales, but they are buying a more predictable and dominant business. Docebo's lower multiple reflects its smaller scale and higher risk profile. From a growth-at-a-reasonable-price perspective, Docebo's valuation appears more attractive given its superior growth outlook. Winner: Docebo offers better value for investors specifically seeking high growth.
Winner: Workday, Inc. over Docebo Inc. While Docebo is a superior pure-play learning platform with a higher growth ceiling, Workday's overwhelming competitive advantages are undeniable. Its key strengths are its massive, integrated platform, which creates extremely high switching costs (net retention >95%), its fortress-like balance sheet generating over $2 billion in annual free cash flow, and its trusted C-suite brand. Docebo's primary weakness is its small scale, making it vulnerable to being bundled out of deals by larger competitors. Its main risk is that enterprises will increasingly choose 'good enough' integrated solutions over best-of-breed specialists. For most investors, Workday represents a much safer and more durable long-term investment in the broader HR technology space.
Cornerstone OnDemand, now a private company owned by Clearlake Capital, was historically one of Docebo's most direct and significant competitors. As a pioneer in cloud-based talent management software, Cornerstone built a massive footprint in the enterprise learning and development space. The comparison is now one of a nimble, public innovator (Docebo) against a large, private equity-owned incumbent undergoing a strategic transformation away from public market scrutiny.
Before going private, Cornerstone's business and moat were built on scale and a comprehensive product suite. It had a massive brand recognition advantage and served thousands of large enterprise clients, giving it significant economies of scale. Its switching costs were high, as its platform was deeply embedded in its customers' HR processes. However, its technology was often viewed as more 'legacy' compared to Docebo's modern, AI-native platform. Docebo's moat is built more on technological superiority and user experience, with a ~104% net retention rate indicating strong customer loyalty. Cornerstone's advantage was its market incumbency and ~93% recurring revenue rate pre-acquisition. Winner: Cornerstone (historically) for its incumbency and scale, but Docebo for its modern technology and stronger customer expansion metrics.
Financially, comparing a public company to a private one is difficult, but we can analyze Cornerstone's profile before its 2021 acquisition. At the time, Cornerstone was generating over $800 million in annual revenue, roughly four times Docebo's current scale. However, its growth had slowed to the low double-digits (~10-15%), significantly below Docebo's current 25% pace. Cornerstone had achieved consistent free cash flow generation, a milestone Docebo has more recently reached. Docebo boasts stronger gross margins (~81% vs. Cornerstone's ~75% pre-private). Docebo also operates with a clean balance sheet holding net cash, whereas Cornerstone is now likely managed with higher leverage, typical of private equity ownership. Winner: Docebo for its superior growth profile and stronger balance sheet.
In terms of past performance as public companies, Docebo has been a story of high growth since its IPO, though with significant stock price volatility. Cornerstone, in its later years as a public entity, delivered more modest growth but had transitioned to a more mature, cash-flow-focused business. Its stock performance was steady but unspectacular, reflecting its slowing growth. Docebo's 3-year revenue CAGR has far outpaced what Cornerstone was delivering before its acquisition. From a risk perspective, Cornerstone was the more stable, less volatile asset, while Docebo's stock has demonstrated much higher risk and reward. Winner: Docebo on growth performance, but Cornerstone for historical stability.
Future growth prospects now diverge significantly. Docebo's growth is driven by organic innovation, AI development, and expanding its market share with a publicly funded growth strategy. Cornerstone's future growth under private equity ownership will likely focus on operational efficiency, strategic acquisitions (tuck-ins), and potentially integrating other assets from Clearlake's portfolio. Innovation may become secondary to profitability and debt service. This gives Docebo a clear edge in agility and organic product development. Winner: Docebo has a clearer and more compelling organic growth story.
Valuation is a hypothetical exercise. Cornerstone was taken private at an EV/Sales multiple of ~6.5x in 2021, a time when software valuations were higher. This is slightly richer than Docebo's current multiple of ~5x. Given Docebo's higher growth rate and cleaner balance sheet today compared to Cornerstone in 2021, its current valuation appears more attractive on a risk-adjusted basis. An investor today is getting a faster-growing asset for a lower relative price than what a private equity firm paid for a slower-growing one. Winner: Docebo appears to be better value today.
Winner: Docebo Inc. over Cornerstone OnDemand, Inc. The verdict rests on Docebo's position as a more modern, agile, and faster-growing public company. Docebo's key strengths are its superior revenue growth (~25% vs. Cornerstone's pre-private ~10-15%), its AI-native platform, and a strong balance sheet with net cash. Cornerstone's notable weakness, even before going private, was its perception as a legacy provider with slowing innovation, a challenge that private ownership may or may not solve. The primary risk for Docebo remains competition from larger players, but against its historical direct rival, it has seized the momentum. The verdict is supported by Docebo's superior financial metrics and more promising organic growth outlook.
SAP SE, the German multinational software giant, competes with Docebo through its SuccessFactors Human Experience Management (HXM) Suite. Much like Oracle and Workday, SAP is an enterprise behemoth for which learning is a single component of a vast, integrated ecosystem of business applications. The contest pits Docebo's specialized, user-centric learning solution against SAP's enormous scale, deep enterprise penetration, and the allure of a single, unified data model for global corporations.
SAP's business and moat are almost unparalleled in the enterprise software world. Its brand is synonymous with Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), and its products are the central nervous system for many of the world's largest companies. This incumbency creates colossal switching costs. The company serves over 400,000 customers in more than 180 countries, an order of magnitude larger than Docebo. Its network effects are driven by its vast ecosystem of developers, consultants, and partners. While SuccessFactors Learning may not be the top-ranked LMS, its seamless integration with SAP's core HR and ERP systems is a powerful moat that Docebo cannot replicate. Winner: SAP possesses one of the strongest moats in the entire software industry, far eclipsing Docebo's.
Financially, SAP is a mature, highly profitable, and cash-generative machine. It generates over €33 billion in annual revenue, with its Cloud segment (which includes SuccessFactors) growing at a healthy ~25% (currency adjusted), showing its successful transition. Docebo's growth is comparable but on a vastly smaller revenue base of ~$200 million. SAP's operating margin is around ~20%, demonstrating significant profitability at scale, whereas Docebo is just beginning to generate positive operating income. SAP also pays a consistent dividend, supported by strong free cash flow of over €5 billion annually. Winner: SAP is in a completely different league financially and is the decisive winner.
Looking at past performance, SAP has been a reliable, albeit slow-growing, long-term investment. Its 5-year revenue CAGR is in the mid-single digits (~6%), reflecting its massive size. Its stock has delivered modest returns, characteristic of a mature blue-chip technology company. Docebo, in contrast, has delivered much faster revenue growth (>30% CAGR) but with the associated high volatility and risk. SAP provides stability and income (dividend yield ~1.5%); Docebo offers high-growth potential. For risk-adjusted returns and stability, SAP has the stronger record. Winner: SAP for its proven, stable performance over decades.
Future growth for SAP is driven by the continued migration of its massive on-premise customer base to the cloud and by cross-selling cloud solutions like SuccessFactors. Its 'RISE with SAP' program is a key strategic initiative to accelerate this transition. While the growth percentage of its cloud business is high, the overall company growth will remain modest. Docebo's growth path is much steeper, as it can still capture market share in a fragmented LMS market. However, SAP's ability to bundle SuccessFactors into large ERP cloud deals remains a significant threat. Winner: Docebo has a higher percentage growth outlook, but SAP's growth is more certain and comes from a much larger base.
From a valuation perspective, SAP trades at a Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio of around 30x and an EV/Sales ratio of ~5.5x. Docebo, being only marginally profitable, is better valued on its EV/Sales multiple of ~5x. They are surprisingly close on a sales multiple basis. However, SAP's valuation is supported by substantial, consistent profits and dividends, while Docebo's is based almost entirely on future growth expectations. This makes SAP a much lower-risk proposition for a similar sales multiple. Winner: SAP offers better value on a risk-adjusted basis, as its valuation is underpinned by strong current profitability.
Winner: SAP SE over Docebo Inc. The verdict is a clear win for the established giant. SAP's primary strengths are its colossal scale, incredibly deep enterprise moat built on its core ERP business, and consistent, massive profitability (~20% operating margin). Its integrated SuccessFactors suite presents a formidable hurdle for any best-of-breed competitor. Docebo's main weakness in this comparison is its minuscule size and its inability to compete on the basis of an integrated, wall-to-wall enterprise platform. The biggest risk for Docebo is that large enterprises, SAP's core market, will always default to the safety and integration of their primary ERP vendor. While Docebo may have a better product for learning, SAP wins the war for the overall enterprise budget.
Oracle Corporation is another technology titan that competes with Docebo through its Oracle Fusion Cloud Human Capital Management (HCM) offering. Similar to SAP and Workday, Oracle's strategy revolves around providing a comprehensive, integrated suite of enterprise applications, from databases and cloud infrastructure to ERP and HR software. The competitive dynamic is a classic David vs. Goliath: Docebo's agile, specialized learning platform against Oracle's all-encompassing, deeply entrenched enterprise ecosystem.
Oracle's business and moat are legendary, built over decades. Its primary moat is its database business, which created immense customer lock-in and high switching costs. This foundation allowed it to expand into enterprise applications, including HCM. The Oracle brand is a fixture in global IT departments. Its scale is astronomical, with revenues exceeding $50 billion annually and a presence in virtually every large organization worldwide. While its learning module may not win standalone bake-offs against Docebo, its tight integration with Oracle's core financial and HR systems makes it the default choice for thousands of Oracle customers. Winner: Oracle has an exceptionally deep and wide moat rooted in decades of enterprise dominance.
Financially, Oracle is a powerhouse. The company generates massive profits and free cash flow (over $10 billion annually). Its revenue growth is modest, in the mid-single digits (~5-7%), driven by its burgeoning cloud infrastructure and applications business which is growing faster (>20%). Docebo's ~25% growth is much faster but on a tiny revenue base. Oracle's operating margins are robust at over 30%, showcasing extreme profitability. It also returns significant capital to shareholders through dividends (yield ~1.4%) and buybacks. Docebo's financials, with its recent turn to profitability and smaller scale, cannot compare. Winner: Oracle is the overwhelming financial winner.
In past performance, Oracle has transformed itself from a legacy database company into a legitimate cloud player. This transition has re-accelerated growth and driven strong stock performance in recent years. Its 5-year revenue CAGR is around 5%, but its shareholder returns have been excellent. Docebo's journey has been that of a high-growth stock, with periods of massive gains followed by sharp corrections. Oracle provides a much smoother and more predictable performance history, backed by a resilient business model and massive capital returns. Winner: Oracle for its successful transformation and strong, more stable shareholder returns.
For future growth, Oracle's path is defined by its cloud infrastructure (OCI) competing with AWS and Azure, and its cloud applications (Fusion, NetSuite) continuing to take share. Its ability to bundle IaaS and SaaS is a key advantage. Analysts expect Oracle to continue its mid-to-high single-digit growth trajectory. Docebo's growth outlook is stronger in percentage terms, but it faces the headwind of these integrated suite providers. Oracle can use its infrastructure and database relationships to push its HCM suite, a powerful go-to-market advantage. Winner: Docebo has a higher percentage growth potential, but Oracle's path is more secure and multi-faceted.
Valuation-wise, Oracle trades at a reasonable P/E ratio of ~20x and an EV/Sales multiple of ~6x. Docebo trades at an EV/Sales multiple of ~5x. For a slightly higher sales multiple, an investor in Oracle gets a company with dominant market positions, massive profits, and a shareholder-friendly capital return policy. Docebo's valuation is entirely dependent on sustaining high growth. On a risk-adjusted basis, Oracle's valuation is more compelling and supported by tangible fundamentals. Winner: Oracle offers superior value given its profitability and market position.
Winner: Oracle Corporation over Docebo Inc. Oracle is the clear victor due to its immense and unassailable position in the enterprise software market. Its key strengths are its deeply entrenched product ecosystem creating high switching costs, its massive profitability (operating margin >30%), and its powerful cross-selling motion that bundles HCM with its core database and cloud infrastructure offerings. Docebo's primary weakness is its lack of scale and an integrated offering, making it a niche player in Oracle's world. The risk for Docebo is that the CIO's decision to consolidate on the Oracle stack will always trump a department head's preference for a better learning tool. Oracle's victory is a testament to the power of incumbency, integration, and scale in enterprise software.
Paycom Software offers a compelling comparison as a high-growth, highly profitable innovator in the broader HCM space, though with a different focus than Docebo. Paycom's core strength is in payroll and core HR for the mid-market, centered around its single-database architecture and employee self-service tools like 'Beti'. While it offers a learning module, it is not its primary focus. The comparison highlights two successful but different strategies: Docebo's best-of-breed learning platform versus Paycom's integrated, payroll-centric HCM suite.
Paycom has built a formidable business and moat in its target market. Its brand is very strong among mid-sized American businesses. Its primary moat is the high switching cost associated with its unified platform; once a company runs its entire HR and payroll on Paycom, it's very difficult and costly to leave. This is evidenced by its industry-leading revenue retention rate of ~91% (which is calculated differently than SaaS net retention but still indicates stickiness). Its scale is significant, with revenue approaching $2 billion, much larger than Docebo. Docebo's moat relies on the quality of its learning product, whereas Paycom's relies on the integration of mission-critical payroll functions. Winner: Paycom has a stronger, more resilient moat tied to the complexities of payroll.
Financially, Paycom is a juggernaut of profitable growth. For years, it has executed on the 'Rule of 40' (growth rate + profit margin > 40) with ease. Its TTM revenue growth is strong at ~22%, and it boasts incredible adjusted EBITDA margins of ~40%. This level of profitability is elite in the software industry and far surpasses Docebo's, which is just reaching break-even. Paycom's free cash flow conversion is also excellent. While Docebo has a strong balance sheet with net cash, Paycom's ability to self-fund its rapid growth through massive internal cash generation places it in a superior financial position. Winner: Paycom is the decisive winner on financial strength and profitability.
Paycom's past performance has been spectacular. It has been one of the best-performing software stocks for much of the last decade, consistently delivering high revenue growth (5-year CAGR ~28%) and margin expansion. Its stock generated massive returns for early investors, though it has faced recent headwinds as growth has moderated from its torrid pace. Docebo has also shown impressive growth, but its stock performance has been far more volatile. Paycom has a much longer and more consistent track record of execution and value creation as a public company. Winner: Paycom has a superior track record of sustained, profitable growth and shareholder returns.
Looking ahead, Paycom's future growth is tied to moving upmarket to larger clients and increasing penetration with its newer products, especially its automated payroll tool, Beti. Its growth is expected to moderate to the 10-15% range, which has concerned investors and led to a recent stock decline. Docebo's growth outlook is higher, projected to stay above 20%. This is a classic inflection point: Paycom is maturing into a slower-growing but highly profitable company, while Docebo is still in its high-growth phase. Winner: Docebo has the edge on near-term future growth potential.
Valuation is where the story gets interesting. Due to its slowing growth outlook, Paycom's valuation has compressed significantly. It now trades at an EV/Sales multiple of ~8x and a forward P/E of ~25x. Docebo trades at a lower EV/Sales of ~5x. While Paycom is more expensive, it comes with world-class profitability. However, for investors prioritizing growth, Docebo's lower multiple combined with its higher growth forecast makes it appear more attractive. The market is pricing in Paycom's deceleration. Winner: Docebo offers better value for investors seeking growth, while Paycom may appeal to those looking for profitability at a now more reasonable price.
Winner: Paycom Software, Inc. over Docebo Inc. Despite Docebo's higher near-term growth prospects, Paycom wins due to its vastly superior business model and financial profile. Paycom's key strengths are its elite profitability (adjusted EBITDA margin ~40%), its strong moat built around a unified payroll-first platform, and its long history of flawless execution. Its notable weakness is its recently decelerating growth rate, which has already been priced into the stock. Docebo's primary risk is that it may never achieve the level of profitability that Paycom has, making its current growth less valuable in the long run. Paycom has already proven it can be both a growth engine and a profit machine, a rare combination that makes it a higher-quality company overall.
Instructure Holdings is a fascinating and direct competitor to Docebo, but with a different center of gravity. Instructure is the undisputed market leader in learning management systems for the education market (K-12 and Higher Ed) with its flagship product, Canvas. It is now making a concerted push into the corporate learning space, putting it on a direct collision course with Docebo. The comparison is between the king of academic LMS and a leader in corporate LMS, both vying for the same enterprise training budgets.
Instructure's business and moat in its core education market are incredibly strong. Canvas has a dominant market share in North American higher education (>40%), creating a powerful brand and network effects among students, faculty, and institutions. Switching costs are very high for a university to change its core learning platform. However, this moat does not directly translate to the corporate world, where it is a challenger brand. Docebo's moat is built entirely within the corporate segment, with features and a sales motion tailored to business needs. Docebo's net retention of ~104% is stronger than Instructure's ~99%. Winner: Instructure has a stronger overall moat due to its quasi-monopoly in education, but Docebo's is stronger within the contested corporate space.
From a financial perspective, Instructure is a larger, more mature business. Its annual revenue is over $500 million, more than double Docebo's. However, its growth is much slower, currently running at ~10% year-over-year. Docebo's ~25% growth is far superior. Both companies have similar strong gross margins in the ~80% range. Instructure carries a significant debt load from its private equity buyout history (net debt/EBITDA ~3x), whereas Docebo has a clean balance sheet with a net cash position. This gives Docebo more financial flexibility. Winner: Docebo wins on its superior growth rate and much healthier balance sheet.
Analyzing past performance, Instructure's history includes being taken private and then returning to the public market in 2021. Its performance has been steady but underwhelming, reflecting its lower growth rate. The stock has been relatively flat since its re-IPO. Docebo's stock has been much more volatile but has offered periods of much higher returns. In terms of operational performance, Docebo's revenue CAGR over the past three years has been significantly higher than Instructure's. Winner: Docebo has demonstrated far superior growth performance.
Both companies have clear future growth drivers. Instructure's growth depends on its ability to successfully penetrate the corporate learning market and continue upselling its existing education customers. This corporate push is its key catalyst but also its biggest challenge. Docebo's growth is more focused on deepening its penetration in the corporate market where it is already a leader, driven by its AI roadmap and multi-product strategy. Docebo's path appears more direct and less dependent on entering a new market where its brand is less known. Winner: Docebo has a clearer and more focused growth outlook.
Valuation provides a stark contrast. Instructure trades at a lower EV/Sales multiple of ~3.5x, compared to Docebo's ~5x. This discount reflects its lower growth rate and leveraged balance sheet. An investor is paying less for each dollar of Instructure's sales, but they are buying a business with more debt and a less certain growth story in the corporate segment. Docebo's premium is for its higher growth, cleaner balance sheet, and focused strategy. The choice depends on investor preference: lower valuation with higher uncertainty (Instructure) or a higher valuation for a clearer growth story (Docebo). Winner: Docebo is arguably a better value despite the higher multiple, as its premium is justified by superior fundamentals.
Winner: Docebo Inc. over Instructure Holdings, Inc. Docebo wins this head-to-head battle of learning specialists. Docebo's key strengths are its significantly higher revenue growth (~25% vs. Instructure's ~10%), its pristine balance sheet with a net cash position, and its established leadership position in the corporate learning market. Instructure's notable weakness is its dependence on a successful, but unproven, pivot into the corporate space to drive future growth, and its balance sheet is burdened by debt. The primary risk for Instructure is that it fails to dislodge focused players like Docebo in the corporate world, leaving it as a slow-growing education utility. Docebo's focused strategy and superior financial health make it the more compelling investment.
Based on industry classification and performance score:
Docebo offers a modern, AI-powered corporate learning platform, generating revenue primarily through recurring software subscriptions. The company's strength lies in its sticky product, as evidenced by high switching costs for its enterprise clients who deeply integrate the system into their operations. However, the company operates in a highly competitive market, and its net revenue retention rate of 100% in the last full fiscal year is a point of concern, suggesting it struggles to expand revenue from existing customers as effectively as top-tier software peers. The overall investor takeaway is mixed: Docebo has a solid, resilient business model but faces significant competitive threats and questions about its ability to drive growth from its current customer base.
While not focused on tax compliance, Docebo's ability to serve `3,980` global enterprise customers, including `492` paying over `100k` annually, demonstrates it has the necessary operational scale and data compliance frameworks (like GDPR and CCPA) to support large, complex organizations.
For an LMS provider, compliance relates less to payroll taxes and more to data privacy regulations (e.g., GDPR in Europe, CCPA in California) and e-learning content standards (e.g., SCORM, xAPI). Docebo's success in attracting and retaining large multinational corporations suggests it has a robust and scalable infrastructure that meets these stringent international compliance requirements. The company's revenue breakdown, with 74% from North America and 26% from the rest of the world, confirms its global operational capacity. This ability to handle diverse regulatory environments is a critical operational strength that enables it to compete for and win global enterprise deals, thereby supporting its scalability. Although this is more of a baseline requirement than a distinct competitive advantage, the company's proven ability to meet these standards merits a 'Pass'.
Although the platform is inherently sticky due to high switching costs, the reported Net Revenue Retention Rate of `100%` for fiscal year 2024 is a significant weakness, indicating an inability to generate net expansion from existing customers.
This factor is re-framed from 'Payroll Stickiness' to 'LMS Platform Stickiness'. While Docebo's platform benefits from high switching costs (a qualitative strength), its quantitative retention metrics are concerning. The company reported a Net Revenue Retention (NRR) Rate of 100% for FY2024. For a growth-focused SaaS company, this is WEAK and significantly BELOW the 110%-125% range often seen in top-tier peers. An NRR of 100% implies that all the revenue gained from customer upgrades and cross-sells was completely offset by revenue lost from customer churn and downgrades. This suggests potential challenges with customer satisfaction, competitive pressure, or the effectiveness of its upselling strategy. The absence of a more recent NRR figure in its TTM data could also be a red flag. Because NRR is a critical indicator of customer health and future growth potential, this subpar metric warrants a 'Fail'.
Docebo has a high-quality revenue stream, with subscriptions making up approximately `94%` of its total revenue and an Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) base of `235.60M`, indicating a predictable and stable business.
A strong recurring revenue base is the hallmark of a healthy SaaS company. In the trailing twelve months, Docebo's subscription revenue was 223.27M out of a total 236.69M, representing 94.3% of its business. This is IN LINE with high-performing SaaS companies in the Human Capital software industry. Its Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) stood at 235.60M as of the latest quarter, providing excellent visibility into future performance. This stable foundation allows the company to invest in product development and sales with confidence. The predictability of its revenue is a significant strength, reducing financial risk and supporting a more stable long-term growth trajectory, warranting a clear 'Pass'.
The company is successfully moving upmarket and increasing customer value, as shown by its growing Average Contract Value of `62.80K` and a strong base of `492` customers paying over `100k` annually.
Docebo's strategy involves not just acquiring new customers but also expanding its revenue from existing ones by selling additional modules and moving them to higher-tier plans. The growth in Average Contract Value from 55.20K in FY2024 to 62.80K in the latest TTM period is direct evidence of this strategy's success. Furthermore, having 492 customers contributing over 100k in ARR indicates deep penetration within larger enterprises. This ability to 'land and expand' is crucial for long-term, capital-efficient growth and also strengthens the company's moat, as customers using multiple modules face even higher switching costs. This performance is a strong positive signal about the platform's value and justifies a 'Pass'.
This factor is not relevant to Docebo's business model as it is a learning software provider, not a payroll processor, and does not hold client funds to generate interest income.
Docebo's business is centered on a SaaS model for its Learning Management System, where it collects subscription fees for software access. Unlike payroll processors that temporarily hold large sums of client funds for payroll and tax payments, Docebo does not engage in this practice. Therefore, it does not generate interest income from client fund balances, and concepts like net interest margin are inapplicable. The company's financial strength comes from the quality and predictability of its software subscriptions, not from financial float. While this factor is not directly applicable, the company's strong recurring revenue base serves as an alternative indicator of financial stability, so we assign a 'Pass' to reflect the health of its core business model.
Docebo currently has a strong financial profile, marked by consistent profitability, positive cash flow, and an exceptionally safe balance sheet. Key strengths include its high gross margins around 80%, expanding operating margins which reached 13.38% in the last quarter, and a net cash position of $63.22 million. However, a notable weakness is the decelerating revenue growth, which has slowed from nearly 20% to 11.16% year-over-year. The investor takeaway is mixed-to-positive; the company is financially solid, but the slowing growth is a significant trend to monitor.
Docebo is demonstrating clear operating leverage, with operating margins expanding significantly as revenue grows, signaling disciplined spending and a maturing business model.
The company is successfully translating revenue growth into higher profitability. The operating margin has shown a clear upward trend, expanding from 8.72% in FY 2024 to 10.02% in Q2 2025 and reaching 13.38% in Q3 2025. This improvement shows that operating expenses are growing slower than revenue, a textbook sign of operating leverage. While industry averages are not available for direct comparison, this positive trend is a strong indicator of financial discipline and a scalable business model. For investors, this suggests that future revenue growth should have an outsized impact on the bottom line.
Docebo consistently converts its profits into cash, though a recent decline in deferred revenue warrants monitoring.
The company demonstrates healthy cash generation. For the full year 2024, operating cash flow ($29.25 million) exceeded net income ($26.74 million), indicating strong cash conversion, and Free Cash Flow (FCF) was a robust $28 million. This trend of positive FCF continued with $5.96 million in Q2 and $5.07 million in Q3. However, in Q3, operating cash flow ($5.29 million) was slightly below net income ($6.11 million), partly due to a -$3.05 million decrease in unearned revenue. While the total deferred revenue balance remains high at $80.06 million, a decrease can be a leading indicator of slowing bookings, making this a key metric to watch.
While revenue growth remains positive, its sharp deceleration from nearly 20% to just over 11% in recent quarters is a key risk for investors to monitor.
Docebo's top-line growth is slowing significantly, which is a primary concern. Year-over-year revenue growth was 19.96% for FY 2024, but slowed to 14.47% in Q2 2025 and further to 11.16% in Q3 2025. For a software company valued on its growth potential, this consistent deceleration is a major red flag. Although the revenue mix quality appears high, as implied by strong gross margins typical of subscription-based models, the slowing growth rate overshadows this strength. This trend could signal increasing competition, market saturation, or macroeconomic pressures impacting customer spending, and therefore justifies a failing grade for this factor.
The balance sheet is exceptionally strong, with a significant net cash position and negligible debt, providing a substantial safety cushion.
Docebo's balance sheet is a key strength. As of Q3 2025, the company held $66.13 million in cash and equivalents against a mere $2.91 million in total debt, resulting in a net cash position of $63.22 million. The Debt-to-Equity ratio is a very low 0.06, indicating minimal reliance on leverage. Its liquidity is also solid, with a current ratio of 1.13. This ratio is even stronger than it appears, as a large portion of current liabilities ($80.06 million) is deferred revenue, a non-cash obligation that represents future business. This robust financial position provides significant flexibility to navigate economic uncertainty, invest in growth, or continue returning capital to shareholders without taking on risk.
The company maintains elite, stable gross margins above 80%, indicating strong pricing power and an efficient software delivery model.
Docebo's gross margin profile is excellent and characteristic of a high-quality SaaS business. In its latest quarter (Q3 2025), the gross margin was 80.1%, consistent with 80.68% in Q2 and 80.81% for the full year 2024. While specific industry benchmarks were not provided, gross margins above 80% are generally considered top-tier in the software industry. These high margins demonstrate significant pricing power and an efficient cost structure for delivering its software, allowing the company to invest heavily in growth initiatives like sales and R&D while still expanding profitability.
Docebo's past performance shows a successful but dramatic shift from a high-growth, unprofitable software company to a more moderately growing and profitable one. Over the last five years, the company has impressively flipped its operating margin from -9.3% to 8.72% and turned free cash flow positive, reaching $28 million in the latest fiscal year. However, this came as revenue growth decelerated from over 65% in 2021 to under 20% recently. The investor takeaway is mixed; while the improving profitability and strong balance sheet are positive signs of a maturing business, the slowing growth and significant historical stock volatility present notable risks.
The company has demonstrated exceptional operating leverage, dramatically improving its operating margin from `-12.45%` in 2021 to a profitable `8.72%` in the latest fiscal year.
Docebo's most impressive historical achievement is its path to profitability. The company has successfully scaled its operations, allowing revenue to grow much faster than its operating costs. The operating margin has seen a clear and consistent upward trend, moving from a significant loss of -$12.98 million (a -12.45% margin) in fiscal 2021 to a solid profit of $18.91 million (an 8.72% margin) in fiscal 2024. This turnaround was not a one-time event but a steady improvement over several years, indicating disciplined cost control and the inherent scalability of its software model. This proven ability to generate profits after years of investment is a major sign of a maturing and financially sound business.
Docebo has successfully transitioned from burning cash to generating strong and growing free cash flow, reaching `$28 million` in the last fiscal year.
The company's free cash flow (FCF) history shows a remarkable turnaround, which is a key indicator of its improving financial health. After posting a negative FCF of -$4.4 million in fiscal 2021, Docebo has delivered increasingly positive results, with FCF growing from $1.21 million in 2022 to $15.33 million in 2023, and further to $28 million in 2024. This consistent improvement demonstrates that the business model is scaling effectively. The FCF margin has expanded significantly, reaching 12.91% in the latest year, a healthy level for a software company. This reliable cash generation provides the company with significant flexibility to invest in growth, repurchase shares, or make strategic acquisitions without relying on external financing.
Docebo has a strong history of revenue compounding at a 5-year CAGR of approximately 36%, though momentum has slowed recently, with the latest year's growth at under 20%.
Docebo's past performance is characterized by impressive revenue growth, which highlights a durable demand for its learning management platform. The company's 5-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of roughly 36% demonstrates a strong product-market fit and successful market penetration. However, it is crucial for investors to note the trend of deceleration. Growth has slowed from a peak of 65.68% in fiscal 2021 to 19.96% in fiscal 2024. While this lower rate is still respectable, it signals a transition from a hyper-growth phase to a more mature growth stage. This historical compounding provides a solid foundation, but the slowing trend is a key risk factor for a company that was previously valued on its high growth.
While business fundamentals have improved, the stock has been highly volatile, with large swings in market capitalization and a wide trading range, making for a turbulent ride for past investors.
Historically, Docebo's stock has not provided a stable return for shareholders. The market capitalization has experienced extreme fluctuations, including a 468% increase in 2020 followed by a -50.52% decline in 2022. The 52-week trading range of $20.20 to $45.33 further highlights this volatility. This price action reflects the market's shifting sentiment towards growth stocks, punishing the company during periods of unprofitability and later rewarding its pivot to cash generation. While the company's underlying performance has become more predictable, its stock price has been anything but. For investors, this history suggests that the stock is sensitive to market sentiment and may not be suitable for those with a low tolerance for risk and price swings.
While specific customer counts are not disclosed, the company's strong multi-year revenue growth, which compounded at over 30% annually, strongly implies a successful track record of customer acquisition and expansion.
Direct metrics such as customer count or net customer additions are not provided in the financial statements. However, revenue growth serves as a strong proxy for customer and seat expansion for a SaaS business like Docebo. The company's revenue grew from $62.92 million in fiscal 2020 to $216.93 million in fiscal 2024, representing a compound annual growth rate of approximately 36%. This level of sustained growth is difficult to achieve without consistently adding new customers and increasing sales to existing ones. Although the growth rate has slowed in recent years to 19.96% in fiscal 2024, the historical performance indicates a strong product-market fit and an effective sales strategy that has successfully captured a growing market share over time.
Docebo is positioned to benefit from the growing corporate e-learning market, driven by its modern, AI-powered platform. Key tailwinds include the increasing need for employee upskilling and the expansion into customer and partner training. However, the company faces intense competition from larger, bundled software suites and other specialized learning platforms. A significant weakness is its stagnant Net Revenue Retention rate, which suggests difficulty in expanding revenue from existing customers. The investor takeaway is mixed; while the market opportunity is strong, Docebo's ability to defend its position and drive profitable growth from its current base remains a concern.
Docebo is successfully expanding upmarket and has a significant opportunity for international growth, with strong traction in attracting large enterprise customers.
Docebo's growth strategy relies heavily on expanding into new segments, particularly larger enterprises, and growing its international footprint. The company is showing clear success in moving upmarket, with 492 customers now contributing over $100,000 in annual recurring revenue. Geographically, with 74% of its revenue still coming from North America, there remains a large, untapped market for international expansion. The current 26% of revenue from the rest of the world provides a solid foundation to build upon. This dual-pronged expansion effort—winning bigger customers and growing globally—is a key driver for future growth and widens the company's total addressable market.
Innovation, particularly in AI and platform extensions like 'Extended Enterprise,' is at the core of Docebo's strategy to increase customer value and differentiate itself from competitors.
Docebo's future growth is fundamentally tied to its ability to innovate and expand its product suite. The company has successfully broadened its platform beyond a traditional LMS to include solutions for customer training and deep AI-powered features. This product expansion is crucial for driving higher Average Contract Value (ACV), which has grown to $62.80K. By launching new modules and enhancing existing ones, Docebo can increase its share of a customer's budget and create stickier relationships. This focus on product-led growth, especially its leadership in applying AI to learning, is the company's most important lever for sustaining growth and defending against competitors.
A weak Net Revenue Retention rate of `100%` is a critical concern, indicating that the company is failing to generate net growth from its existing customer base, which severely limits its overall growth potential.
This factor has been adapted to focus on revenue expansion from existing customers, a key driver for SaaS companies. While Docebo's Average Revenue Per User (ARPU) growth appears strong, this is dangerously misleading when viewed alongside its last reported Net Revenue Retention (NRR) rate of 100% for fiscal year 2024. An NRR of 100% means that revenue from customer upgrades and cross-sells was completely offset by revenue lost from customer churn and downgrades. This indicates a net-zero growth from the existing customer cohort, a significant weakness for a SaaS business. This metric suggests that all of the company's net revenue growth is coming from new logos, which is a far more expensive and less efficient way to grow. This fundamental issue warrants a 'Fail'.
Docebo has primarily focused on organic growth, which reduces integration risk and allows for focused execution, though it has the balance sheet capacity to pursue strategic acquisitions if opportunities arise.
Unlike some of its peers who have grown heavily through acquisition, Docebo's strategy has been centered on organic product development and sales execution. This approach, while potentially slower, avoids the significant risks and complexities associated with integrating different technologies, teams, and customer bases. By focusing on its own platform, the company has built a cohesive and innovative product suite. While there is no evidence that M&A is a core part of its current strategy, a strong balance sheet provides the flexibility to acquire smaller companies to add new technology or enter adjacent markets in the future. This self-reliant growth model is a sign of underlying strength.
Recent revenue and recurring revenue growth rates have moderated to the high single digits, and without clear company guidance or pipeline metrics like RPO, near-term growth visibility is limited.
While Docebo continues to grow, the pace has decelerated. Comparing trailing-twelve-month figures to the last full fiscal year shows Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) growth of approximately 7.2%. For a company in the competitive SaaS industry, this rate is modest and may not meet the expectations of growth-oriented investors. The company has not provided explicit forward-looking revenue guidance or key pipeline metrics like Remaining Performance Obligation (RPO) in the available data, which makes it difficult to assess the near-term demand environment. This lack of visibility, combined with a moderating growth rate, suggests a cautious outlook is warranted.
As of January 10, 2026, with a stock price of $22.01, Docebo Inc. appears to be undervalued. This conclusion is based on a significant discount to analyst price targets, a compelling valuation implied by its future cash flows, and multiples that have compressed to levels below historical averages. Key metrics supporting this view include a forward P/E ratio of approximately 15.0x-17.3x and a forward EV/Sales multiple around 2.4x, which are reasonable given the company's projected 30%+ EPS growth. The stock has been punished for slowing revenue growth, but this may overlook its strong profitability and cash generation, making the current valuation a favorable entry point for investors with a multi-year horizon.
Despite slowing growth, the company's EV/Sales multiple is at a significant discount to both its history and its peers, suggesting overly pessimistic expectations are priced in.
Docebo currently trades at an EV/Sales (TTM) multiple of 2.4x and a similar forward multiple. This is substantially lower than its historical 3-year average, which was often above 6.0x, and well below peers like Workday (5.9x) and Paylocity (5.2x). While revenue growth has decelerated to ~11%, this multiple seems to overly discount the high quality of that revenue (94% recurring, 80%+ gross margin). For a profitable and cash-generative SaaS business, a 2.4x sales multiple is modest and indicates that the market is focusing heavily on the growth deceleration while ignoring the significant improvements in profitability.
The PEG ratio is well below 1.0, signaling that the stock's price is low relative to its expected earnings growth.
The Price/Earnings-to-Growth (PEG) ratio provides excellent context for growth stocks. Using a Forward P/E of ~17x and the consensus EPS Growth % (3-5Y) of over 30%, Docebo's PEG ratio is approximately 0.57 (17 / 30). A PEG ratio below 1.0 is widely considered to indicate a potentially undervalued stock. This figure suggests that an investor is paying a very reasonable price for each unit of expected earnings growth, making it a strong pass on this growth-adjusted valuation metric.
With a strong buyback program funded by free cash flow and a large net cash position, the company is delivering a solid shareholder yield.
Docebo does not pay a dividend, instead returning capital through share repurchases. The company has shown significant buyback activity, and its strong net cash position of roughly 10% of its market cap provides ample firepower for future returns. The combination of its FCF Yield (~1.4%) and a potent Buyback Yield (which could be over 6% based on recent activity) creates an attractive shareholder yield. This demonstrates management's commitment to creating value and its belief that the stock is intrinsically worth more than its current price.
The forward P/E ratio is compellingly low when viewed in the context of the company's high expected earnings growth rate.
Docebo's trailing P/E ratio is around 29x, while its forward P/E ratio is estimated to be between 15x and 17.3x. A forward P/E below 20x is quite low for a SaaS company. This valuation is especially attractive when considering projections for an EPS CAGR of over 30%. This sharp disconnect between a low forward earnings multiple and a high earnings growth rate suggests the stock is undervalued on an earnings basis. While the TTM multiple seems average, the forward multiple indicates that the market is underappreciating the company's profit potential from continued operating leverage.
Docebo's cash flow multiples are reasonable and reflect a business that is efficiently converting profits into cash.
Docebo trades at an EV/EBITDA (TTM) of approximately 13.2x and an EV/FCF (TTM) of 17.8x. These multiples are not demanding for a software company with 80%+ gross margins and expanding operating margins. The company's ability to generate positive free cash flow is a crucial indicator of financial health. Compared to peers like Paylocity, which has an EV/EBITDA of 20.2x, Docebo's valuation on a cash flow basis appears attractive, especially given its strong balance sheet with over $63 million in net cash.
The primary risk for Docebo is the hyper-competitive landscape of corporate learning software. It competes directly with massive, well-capitalized companies such as Cornerstone OnDemand, Workday, SAP, and Oracle. These giants have significant advantages, including larger sales forces, massive marketing budgets, and the ability to bundle their learning platforms with other essential HR software like payroll and core human resources systems. This bundling strategy can make it difficult for a specialized provider like Docebo to win new enterprise clients or can force it into price competition, potentially eroding its gross margins, which stood at a healthy 81% as of early 2024. As the market matures, features may become commoditized, making it harder for Docebo to stand out on technology alone.
Macroeconomic headwinds pose another significant threat. Corporate spending on learning and development (L&D) is often considered discretionary. In an economic slowdown or recession, companies typically look to cut costs, and L&D budgets are frequently among the first to be reduced. This could lead to longer sales cycles, lower deal sizes, and higher customer churn for Docebo. A high-interest-rate environment also puts pressure on corporate spending and can negatively impact the valuation of growth-oriented tech stocks like Docebo, as investors demand clearer and quicker paths to substantial profitability.
From a company-specific perspective, Docebo's long-term success hinges on its ability to achieve consistent and growing profitability. While the company has made strides, recently posting positive free cash flow and adjusted profits, its GAAP net income remains thin, showing a net loss of $-0.3 million in the first quarter of 2024. The market's tolerance for unprofitable growth has diminished, and Docebo must continue to balance its heavy investments in research & development and sales with financial discipline. Additionally, its reputation is heavily built on its AI-powered platform. While a key differentiator now, the AI landscape is evolving at an explosive pace. A failure to innovate faster than competitors could quickly turn this strength into a weakness, making it crucial for Docebo to maintain its technological leadership to justify its premium offering.
Click a section to jump