Updated on October 27, 2025, this report presents a comprehensive evaluation of Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (AUBN), examining its business model, financial health, past performance, future growth, and fair value. Our analysis benchmarks AUBN against key competitors, including ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS), Southern States Bancshares, Inc. (SSBK), and Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. (PNFP), distilling all takeaways through the investment philosophies of Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger.
Negative. Auburn National Bancorporation is a fairly valued community bank with a strong dividend. However, its future growth outlook is weak due to intense competition in its small local market. The bank's historical earnings have been volatile, and its profitability consistently lags its peers. While core lending income is growing, overall returns and efficiency remain poor. The bank lacks a clear strategy for expansion, leaving its long-term prospects stagnant. The high dividend may not compensate for the significant risks of a deteriorating competitive position.
US: NASDAQ
Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc., operating through its subsidiary AuburnBank, is a traditional community bank with a history stretching back to 1907. Its business model is straightforward and centered on relationship-based banking within its primary market of East Alabama, particularly Lee County, home to Auburn University. The bank's core operation involves attracting deposits from local individuals and businesses and then lending that money back into the community. Its main products are loan services, which generate interest income, and deposit services for customers. The primary source of profit is the net interest margin, which is the difference between the interest it earns on loans and the interest it pays on deposits. The bank also generates a smaller portion of its revenue from noninterest income, primarily through fees on deposit accounts and debit card usage.
The bank's most significant product line is its loan portfolio, specifically Commercial Real Estate (CRE) and Construction loans. Combined, these categories represent over 66% of the bank's total loans, or approximately $404 million at the end of 2023. This product serves local real estate developers, investors, and small business owners who need financing for properties like office buildings, retail centers, and new construction projects. The market for these loans is intensely local and competitive, with AUBN facing off against other community banks, larger regional players like Regions and Truist, and local credit unions. While the overall US CRE market is massive, AUBN's sandbox is confined to East Alabama, where economic health is tied to the university and local development. The main competitive factors are relationships, local decision-making speed, and loan pricing. Its moat in this segment is derived purely from its local knowledge and long-standing community ties, which allows for better risk assessment on local projects. However, this hyper-concentration is also its greatest weakness. An economic downturn in its small geographic footprint or a slump in the commercial property market could severely impact the bank's financial health, making this product line a source of significant vulnerability.
Residential real estate lending is another key product, comprising nearly 24% of the loan book, or about $144 million. These are standard mortgage loans for individuals and families purchasing homes in the Auburn-Opelika area. The target customer is the local resident, often an existing deposit customer of the bank. While this is a core service for a community bank, the market is highly commoditized and competitive. AUBN competes not only with local banks but also with large national mortgage originators who can often offer more competitive rates and a more streamlined digital experience. The stickiness of these customers can be moderate; while some prefer to bank where they have a relationship, many will shop aggressively for the best mortgage rate. AUBN's competitive position here is based on convenience for its existing customers and its local brand trust. It does not possess a strong, durable moat in this area as it lacks the scale to compete on price or the technology to compete on process with larger, specialized lenders. It is a necessary product offering rather than a key area of competitive strength.
The bank's strongest product is its deposit gathering capability. This is the foundation of any bank, and AUBN has built a solid base of low-cost, stable funding. The bank offers standard checking, savings, and time deposit (CD) accounts to local individuals and businesses. A key strength is its significant portion of noninterest-bearing deposits, which made up 25% of total deposits in early 2024. These are essentially free funds for the bank to lend out. Its customer base is local and relationship-driven, valuing the convenience of its 8 branches. This loyalty is demonstrated by the fact that AUBN has zero brokered deposits—more expensive, less stable funds sourced from outside its core market—and a relatively low level of uninsured deposits (under 24%). This deposit franchise is the bank's most discernible moat. It provides a durable funding advantage over competitors that rely on more volatile or expensive funding sources. However, a notable weakness is the stagnant growth in deposits, which grew less than 1% year-over-year, indicating a struggle to attract new customers in a competitive rate environment.
Finally, the bank's fee-generating services represent a minor but important part of its business. These services, such as charges on deposit accounts and debit card interchange fees, account for less than 17% of total revenue. This is a relatively low percentage compared to peers who often have more diversified income streams from areas like wealth management, trust services, or robust mortgage banking operations. The customers for these services are essentially all of the bank's deposit holders. There is no competitive moat in this area; these are standard, commoditized services offered by all banks. The bank's limited fee income diversification is a strategic weakness. It leaves AUBN highly dependent on its net interest margin, making its revenue and profitability more vulnerable to fluctuations in interest rates. A period of compressed interest margins would directly and significantly impact its bottom line due to the lack of a substantial fee income cushion.
In conclusion, Auburn National Bancorporation's business model is that of a classic, geographically-focused community bank. Its competitive moat is built almost entirely on its strong local presence, which allows it to cultivate a loyal, low-cost core deposit base. This is a valuable asset that provides stable and inexpensive funding, which is the lifeblood of any lending institution. The bank's long history and brand recognition in its small market create a degree of customer stickiness that is difficult for outside competitors to replicate. This local entrenchment provides a narrow but defensible competitive advantage.
However, the durability of this moat is questionable due to significant structural weaknesses. The bank's business is a textbook case of concentration risk. Its fortunes are tied to the economic health of a single county in Alabama, and its loan portfolio is dangerously concentrated in the volatile commercial real estate sector. This lack of diversification is a critical vulnerability. Furthermore, the business model is not evolving; fee income remains a small part of the revenue mix, and deposit growth has stalled. While the bank's relationship-based model has served it well for over a century, it appears ill-equipped to fend off technologically advanced competitors or withstand a localized economic shock. The business model is resilient only as long as its local market remains stable and prosperous.
Auburn National Bancorporation's recent financial results paint a portrait of a highly conservative institution navigating a complex environment. On the income statement, the primary strength is the consistent growth in Net Interest Income, which rose 11.5% in Q3 2025 and 9.5% in Q2 2025. This indicates the bank is successfully managing the spread between its loan yields and deposit costs. However, overall profitability remains a challenge. The bank's Return on Assets (ROA) of 0.72% and Return on Equity (ROE) of 10.35% are below the typical benchmarks for community banks, suggesting it is not generating strong returns from its asset base. This is largely driven by a high cost structure, with a calculated efficiency ratio hovering above 70%, a level considered inefficient.
The balance sheet reveals a fortress-like liquidity position but also a major vulnerability. The loan-to-deposit ratio of 59.9% is exceptionally low, meaning the bank has a large cushion of liquid assets and is not overly reliant on loans for earnings. This reduces credit risk but also limits potential income. The most significant red flag is the large negative balance in 'Comprehensive Income and Other', which stood at -$23.31 million in Q2 2025. This figure, likely representing unrealized losses on investment securities, erases over a quarter of the bank's tangible book value, exposing a high degree of sensitivity to interest rate fluctuations.
From a cash generation and leverage standpoint, the company appears stable. It carries virtually no traditional debt beyond customer deposits and has consistently generated positive operating cash flow. It also maintains a steady dividend, with a payout ratio of around 53%, which appears sustainable given current earnings. However, the flat loan growth in the recent quarter suggests a potential lack of new business generation. In summary, the bank's financial foundation is stable due to its conservative, liquid balance sheet, but its performance is hampered by poor efficiency and significant interest rate risk that investors must monitor closely.
An analysis of Auburn National Bancorporation's performance over the last five fiscal years (FY2020–FY2024) reveals a company facing significant operational challenges and an inability to generate consistent growth. The bank's earnings have been exceptionally volatile, undermining confidence in management's execution. For example, EPS growth swung from +29.96% in 2022 to a devastating -86.47% in 2023, followed by a large rebound from that low base. This inconsistency points to a business model that is not resilient to changes in the economic and interest rate environment. Overall, the 5-year EPS compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is negative at approximately -3.2%, reflecting a business that has gone backward in terms of profitability.
Profitability has been a persistent weakness. The bank's Return on Equity (ROE), a key measure of how effectively it uses shareholder money, has been erratic, ranging from a low of 1.93% to a peak of 12.05% over the period. The three-year average ROE is just 7.4%, a figure significantly below the 12%+ that higher-quality regional banks like Pinnacle Financial Partners or United Community Banks typically generate. This underperformance is driven by stagnant net interest income, which has barely grown from $24.34 million in 2020 to $27.13 million in 2024, and a high efficiency ratio, which reached an alarming 97% in 2023, indicating extremely poor cost controls relative to income.
From a balance sheet perspective, the story is equally concerning. While gross loans have shown modest growth, total deposits have actually declined from a peak of $994.24 million in 2021 to $895.82 million in 2024. For a community bank, a shrinking deposit base is a major red flag as deposits are the core funding source for lending. This trend suggests the bank is losing customers or is uncompetitive in its local market. The only bright spot in its past performance has been a consistent dividend, which management has continued to pay and even slightly increase. However, the dividend's safety came into question in 2023 when the payout ratio soared to 270%, meaning the company paid out far more in dividends than it earned. This reliance on paying a dividend despite poor performance is not a sustainable long-term strategy.
The community and regional banking industry is navigating a period of significant change, with the next 3-5 years likely to be defined by two key trends: continued consolidation and the imperative of digital transformation. The regulatory and technology investment burdens disproportionately favor larger institutions with economies of scale, making it harder for smaller banks like Auburn to compete. The US regional banking market is expected to see modest growth, with a projected CAGR of around 3-4%, but this growth will not be evenly distributed. Competition is intensifying not just from other banks, but from fintech companies and national lenders using digital platforms to capture customers anywhere, eroding the geographic moats of community banks. Customer expectations have shifted permanently towards seamless digital experiences for everything from opening an account to applying for a loan. Banks that fail to invest and adapt risk becoming irrelevant, leading to a landscape where the number of smaller, independent banks will likely continue its long-term decline.
The outlook for Auburn's loan portfolio, the primary engine of its revenue, is weak. Its largest segment, Commercial Real Estate (CRE) and Construction lending, already accounts for over 66% of its total loans, or approximately ~$404 million. This concentration severely limits the potential for responsible growth; increasing this exposure would add significant risk, while de-risking would cause loan shrinkage. Growth in this segment is entirely dependent on the health of the local East Alabama property market, which is a fragile foundation. Its residential mortgage business (~$144 million) faces intense competition from larger, national lenders who can offer better rates and more efficient digital processes. It is highly unlikely AUBN can gain market share here. The most concerning trend is the 20% year-over-year decline in its commercial and industrial (C&I) loan book, indicating an inability to grow in a core business lending category. A plausible future risk is a downturn in the local CRE market, which is a high-probability event over a 3-5 year cycle. Such a downturn would directly lead to higher loan losses and severely impact the bank's earnings and capital.
Equally challenging is the outlook for the bank's funding and noninterest income. The bank's core strength—its stable, low-cost deposit base of ~$883 million—is showing signs of fatigue, with growth of less than 1% annually. In the current interest rate environment, competition for deposits is fierce. AUBN will likely see a continued shift in its deposit mix from noninterest-bearing accounts (~25% of total) towards higher-cost certificates of deposit as customers seek better yields. This will put sustained pressure on its net interest margin, the key driver of its profitability. Compounding this issue is the bank's underdeveloped fee income streams, which contribute less than 17% of total revenue. Lacking services like wealth management or treasury services, the bank has no visible plan to diversify its revenue away from its reliance on interest rate spreads. This makes its entire business model vulnerable to margin compression, a risk that is medium-to-high in the current economic climate.
Strategically, Auburn National Bancorporation appears to be adrift with no clear vision for future growth. There is no evidence of a robust digital strategy to attract younger customers or defend against tech-savvy competitors. The bank has not articulated any plans to enter new business lines to generate fee income or to diversify its loan portfolio away from CRE. Given its stagnant organic growth profile and significant concentration risks, the most probable path to realizing shareholder value is not through its own operations but through an acquisition. A larger regional bank could find AUBN's low-cost local deposit franchise attractive as a bolt-on acquisition to enter the Auburn market. For a prospective investor, this means any potential upside is likely tied to a take-out premium rather than the company's own ability to grow and compound value over the next 3-5 years.
Based on the stock price of $25.42 as of October 27, 2025, a comprehensive analysis indicates that Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (AUBN) is trading at a fair value. The valuation is grounded in the company's solid fundamentals as a regional community bank, where balance sheet metrics are paramount.
A triangulated valuation reinforces this view. The primary method for a bank like AUBN is the asset-based approach. The Price to Tangible Book (P/TBV) ratio is a cornerstone metric, comparing the stock price to the bank's tangible net worth. With a tangible book value per share of $24.64 and a current price of $25.42, the P/TBV is 1.03x. This is a classic signal of fair valuation, as the market price is almost identical to the underlying value of the bank's assets. A reasonable fair-value range based on this method, assuming a multiple between 1.0x and 1.15x (a slight premium for its profitability), would be $24.64 – $28.34.
From a multiples perspective, the stock trades at a P/E ratio (TTM) of 12.42x. Compared to industry averages, which currently hover around 11.7x to 13.5x, AUBN is situated squarely within the typical range for regional banks. This suggests the market is not applying a significant discount or premium based on its earnings. Applying the peer average P/E of ~12x to AUBN's EPS (TTM) of $2.05 implies a value of $24.60, further supporting the current price.
Finally, a yield-based approach provides context on shareholder returns. The dividend yield is an attractive 4.25%, with a sustainable payout ratio of 52.77%. While a simple Dividend Discount Model is highly sensitive to growth and rate assumptions, the current yield provides a strong income component and a floor for the stock's valuation, making it attractive to income-focused investors. Combining these methods, with the most weight on the P/TBV approach, a fair value range of $25 - $28 seems appropriate.
Warren Buffett's investment thesis for banks centers on finding simple, predictable institutions with a durable moat, typically in the form of low-cost, stable deposits, combined with conservative underwriting and consistent, high returns on equity. From this perspective, Auburn National Bancorporation (AUBN) would be deeply unappealing. The bank's performance metrics, such as a Return on Average Equity (ROAE) in the low single digits and a Return on Average Assets (ROAA) around 0.5%, fall dramatically short of the 12-15% ROAE Buffett typically seeks, indicating the business does not compound shareholder capital effectively. Furthermore, its high efficiency ratio of over 75% points to a significant lack of operational discipline and scale, a major red flag for an investor who values lean and profitable operations. While the stock trades below its tangible book value, Buffett would view this as a classic 'value trap'—a statistically cheap stock that is cheap for a very good reason: it is a poor business being outcompeted by larger, more efficient rivals. If forced to suggest alternatives, Buffett would likely point to Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) for its superior growth and ~12% ROAE, ServisFirst Bancshares (SFBS) for its exceptional 15%+ ROAE and efficiency, or Regions Financial (RF) for its scale and stability. Buffett's decision would only change if AUBN underwent a complete management overhaul that led to a credible plan for achieving a consistent double-digit ROAE and dramatically improving its cost structure.
Charlie Munger's investment philosophy centers on buying wonderful businesses at fair prices, emphasizing high returns on capital and competent management that avoids obvious errors. He would view Auburn National Bancorporation with extreme skepticism, as its performance metrics signal a fundamentally weak business. The bank's Return on Average Equity (ROAE), a critical measure of profitability, consistently falls below 5%, which is far below the 12-15% he would expect from a quality franchise and indicates an inability to create shareholder value. Furthermore, its efficiency ratio of over 75%—meaning it costs over 75 cents to generate a dollar of revenue—points to a severe lack of scale and operational discipline, a form of 'stupidity' he seeks to avoid. While the stock appears cheap trading below tangible book value, Munger would classify it as a classic value trap, as a low price cannot fix a broken business model. If forced to choose leaders in this sector, Munger would prefer proven compounders like ServisFirst Bancshares (SFBS), which boasts an ROAE over 15%, or Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP), which has a durable moat built on attracting top banking talent. For retail investors, the takeaway from Munger's perspective is to prioritize business quality over statistical cheapness; he would unequivocally avoid AUBN. A complete change in management accompanied by a credible strategy to dramatically improve returns would be the only thing that could change this negative verdict.
Bill Ackman would view Auburn National Bancorporation as a fundamentally flawed, low-quality business that fails to meet any of his core investment criteria. Ackman seeks simple, predictable, cash-generative companies with dominant market positions and high returns on capital, whereas AUBN is a sub-scale community bank with stagnant growth and severely lagging profitability. For instance, its Return on Average Equity (ROAE) is often in the low single digits, far below the 12-15% that high-quality peers like Pinnacle Financial Partners or ServisFirst Bancshares generate, indicating it creates very little value for its shareholders. The bank's inefficiency is also a major red flag; its efficiency ratio of over 75% means it spends far too much to generate revenue compared to top-tier banks that operate below 50%. While it trades below its tangible book value, Ackman would see this not as a bargain but as a classic 'value trap,' reflecting the market's correct assessment that the bank is unable to earn its cost of capital. An activist might see a potential M&A catalyst, but the company is far too small to attract Ackman's attention. The key takeaway for retail investors is that cheapness is not a thesis, and AUBN's poor fundamentals make it an investment to avoid. Forced to choose the best banks in this sub-industry, Ackman would favor Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) for its superior talent-driven growth model and ~12% ROAE, ServisFirst Bancshares (SFBS) for its industry-leading efficiency ratio below 40% and >1.4% ROAA, and United Community Banks (UCBI) for its proven track record as a successful acquirer delivering consistent ~13% ROAE. A definitive plan to sell the bank to a larger, competent operator at a significant premium would be the only event that could change this negative assessment.
Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. operates as a classic community bank, deeply rooted in its local Alabama market. This model, centered on relationship-based lending and deposit gathering, has historically provided stability. However, in the current financial landscape, this hyper-local focus presents significant challenges when compared to the broader competition. The bank's small scale, with assets around $1 billion, limits its ability to invest in technology, diversify its loan portfolio, and absorb economic shocks, placing it at a distinct disadvantage against larger, more efficient regional banks that benefit from economies of scale.
Competitors, even those only slightly larger, often demonstrate superior financial performance. They typically achieve higher profitability ratios, such as Return on Assets (ROA) and Return on Equity (ROE), which indicates they are better at converting their resources into profits. Furthermore, the banking industry is increasingly driven by technological innovation, from mobile banking platforms to digital loan origination. AUBN's capacity to compete on this front is limited, which could lead to losing customers, particularly younger demographics, to more tech-savvy rivals. This technology gap is not just a matter of convenience; it also impacts operational efficiency, and AUBN's high efficiency ratio suggests its cost structure is heavier than its peers.
From an investment perspective, AUBN's story is one of income versus growth. The company has historically offered a substantial dividend yield, which can be attractive to investors seeking regular cash flow. However, this high yield is paired with stagnant stock price performance and minimal earnings growth. In contrast, many competing banks offer a blend of moderate dividends and significant capital appreciation potential, driven by loan growth, market expansion, and strategic acquisitions. Investors must therefore weigh AUBN's steady income stream against the opportunity cost of missing out on the superior total returns offered by more dynamic players in the regional banking sector.
Pinnacle Financial Partners (PNFP) is a high-growth, large regional bank headquartered in Nashville, Tennessee, making it an aspirational peer for AUBN. PNFP's strategy revolves around attracting top-tier, experienced bankers from competitors and empowering them to build deep client relationships, primarily in urban markets. This model has fueled explosive growth, taking PNFP from a startup in 2000 to over $45 billion in assets today. Comparing the tiny, slow-moving AUBN to a dynamic powerhouse like PNFP underscores the vast gap between a stagnant community bank and a best-in-class regional growth story.
When evaluating Business & Moat, PNFP operates on a different level. Its brand is exceptionally strong in markets like Nashville, where it is a dominant player, known for its high level of service (ranked #1 workplace). This far exceeds AUBN's localized reputation. PNFP's model creates high switching costs as clients are loyal to their specific bankers, who are in turn incentivized to stay at Pinnacle. Its scale ($45B+ in assets) provides immense advantages in technology, product offerings, and efficiency over AUBN's $1B. PNFP also benefits from network effects, particularly within the business communities of the cities it serves. Both face similar regulatory barriers, but PNFP's scale makes compliance more efficient. Winner: Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., due to its powerful, talent-centric business model that has created a strong brand and significant scale.
In terms of Financial Statement Analysis, PNFP is vastly superior. It has a long history of strong revenue growth, often achieving double-digit annual increases in loans and deposits, dwarfing AUBN's flat performance. PNFP consistently maintains a healthy Net Interest Margin and a best-in-class efficiency ratio for its size, often in the low 50% range, showcasing excellent cost control compared to AUBN's bloated >75%. Profitability metrics are a clear win for PNFP, with its ROAA typically around 1.2% or higher and ROAE often exceeding 12%, both of which are multiples of what AUBN generates. PNFP is well-capitalized with robust liquidity and a proven ability to generate strong internal capital to fund its growth. Winner: Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., for its elite levels of growth, profitability, and efficiency.
Looking at past performance, PNFP has been an outstanding performer for long-term shareholders. Over the last 10 years, its revenue and EPS CAGR have been in the double digits, a stark contrast to AUBN's minimal growth. This operational success has translated into exceptional TSR, creating significant wealth for its investors, while AUBN's stock has largely treaded water. On margin trend, PNFP has navigated changing interest rate cycles skillfully, protecting profitability. From a risk standpoint, PNFP's rapid growth could be a concern, but its disciplined underwriting has resulted in strong credit quality, and its geographic diversification across several high-growth Southeastern markets makes it more resilient than AUBN. Winner: Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., for its stellar track record of growth and shareholder value creation.
PNFP's future growth prospects are excellent. Its primary driver is its proven ability to enter new urban markets, recruit top bankers, and rapidly gain market share (pipeline). The economic vitality of its core markets in the Southeast provides a strong TAM/demand tailwind. It continues to invest in technology to enhance its high-touch service model, giving it an edge over smaller competitors. AUBN has no comparable growth drivers. While PNFP's growth may slow as it gets larger, its outlook is still far superior to AUBN's stagnant future. Winner: Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., for its replicable and highly effective growth model.
On Fair Value, PNFP commands a premium valuation that is well-earned. It typically trades at a high P/TBV multiple, often 1.6x or more, reflecting investors' high expectations for future growth and profitability. Its P/E ratio is also generally higher than the industry average. While AUBN may look 'cheaper' on these metrics and offer a higher dividend yield, it is a classic value trap. The quality vs. price analysis strongly favors PNFP; its premium price is a fair exchange for its high quality, strong management, and clear growth runway. Buying AUBN is buying a discounted, underperforming asset with no catalyst for change. Winner: Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc., as its premium valuation is justified by its best-in-class performance.
Winner: Pinnacle Financial Partners, Inc. over Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. This is a competition between an industry leader and a laggard. PNFP's key strengths are its unique, talent-focused business model, which drives exceptional organic growth, its superior profitability (ROAE > 12%), and its presence in some of the fastest-growing markets in the U.S. AUBN's notable weaknesses are its complete absence of a growth strategy, poor returns on shareholder capital, and sub-scale operations that put it at a permanent competitive disadvantage. The risk for AUBN is simply fading into irrelevance as dynamic competitors like PNFP redefine what it means to be a successful bank. PNFP is fundamentally a better business and a more compelling investment opportunity in every respect.
Regions Financial Corporation (RF) is a major super-regional bank with over $150 billion in assets and a significant presence in AUBN's home state of Alabama. This comparison is one of David vs. Goliath, illustrating the immense challenges a small community bank like AUBN faces when competing against a financial behemoth. Regions offers a full suite of services, from retail and commercial banking to wealth management and capital markets, that AUBN cannot possibly match. The competitive gap between them spans every facet of the banking business, including brand recognition, technological capabilities, and product diversity.
In the realm of Business & Moat, Regions has an overwhelming advantage. Its brand is a household name across the South, supported by a massive marketing budget and extensive physical presence (~1,300 branches). This dwarfs AUBN's hyper-local brand. While AUBN may have deep personal relationships, Regions benefits from high switching costs due to its integrated product ecosystem (e.g., checking, mortgage, investments). The scale difference is immense ($150B vs. $1B), giving Regions unparalleled economies of scale in technology, compliance, and marketing. Regions also benefits from network effects with its vast base of commercial and retail customers. Both face stringent regulatory barriers, but Regions' scale allows it to manage this cost far more effectively. Winner: Regions Financial Corporation, due to its fortress-like competitive position built on brand, scale, and a comprehensive product offering.
Financial Statement Analysis demonstrates the benefits of scale. While Regions' massive size means its revenue growth is often in the low-to-mid single digits, its revenue base is thousands of times larger than AUBN's. Regions' Net Interest Margin is comparable to AUBN's, but its ability to generate massive non-interest income from fees for services gives it a more diversified and stable revenue stream. On profitability, Regions' ROAA (~1.0%) and ROAE (~10-12%) are consistently superior to AUBN's sub-par returns, indicating far better management of its assets and equity. As a large, systemically important bank, Regions manages its liquidity and capital under much stricter regulatory scrutiny, making its balance sheet exceptionally resilient. Its efficiency ratio is also markedly better, typically below 60%. Winner: Regions Financial Corporation, for its diversified revenue streams and vastly superior profitability.
An evaluation of past performance shows Regions as a more stable, albeit slower-growing, entity. Over a 5-year period, Regions has delivered steady, if not spectacular, EPS growth and has been a consistent dividend payer. Its TSR has been cyclical, tied to the broader economy and interest rate expectations, but has generally outperformed AUBN over the long term. On margin trend, Regions has the sophistication to manage its balance sheet actively in response to rate changes. From a risk perspective, Regions is a much safer investment. Its loan book is highly diversified by geography and industry, and its status as a large bank means it has robust risk management systems. AUBN's risk is concentrated in a small geographic area. Winner: Regions Financial Corporation, for its superior stability, risk management, and long-term shareholder returns.
Regions' future growth is tied to the economic health of the Southeastern U.S. and its ability to execute on strategic initiatives like growing fee-based businesses and digital customer engagement. Its growth drivers are incremental but massive in dollar terms: cross-selling wealth management to its banking customers, expanding its commercial lending, and optimizing its branch network (pipeline). It has a clear edge in its ability to invest billions in technology to improve efficiency and customer experience. AUBN has no such levers to pull. While Regions won't grow as fast as a smaller, agile bank, its path is far more certain than AUBN's. Winner: Regions Financial Corporation, due to its multiple, well-funded avenues for steady future growth.
From a Fair Value perspective, large super-regional banks like Regions typically trade at lower multiples than high-growth regionals. Its P/TBV is often around 1.2x-1.4x, and its P/E ratio is usually in line with the broader banking sector. AUBN's valuation is lower, but it lacks Regions' safety and stability. Regions' dividend yield is typically solid (~4-5%) and supported by a reasonable payout ratio, making it attractive to income investors. The quality vs. price decision favors Regions. It offers a combination of safety, a solid dividend, and moderate growth prospects at a fair valuation, making it a much more reliable investment than the deeply troubled AUBN. Winner: Regions Financial Corporation, for offering a superior risk/reward proposition for most investors.
Winner: Regions Financial Corporation over Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. Regions is unequivocally the superior entity, embodying the strengths of scale, diversification, and market power. Its key strengths are its dominant brand in the Southeast, its diversified revenue streams that reduce reliance on interest income, and its robust risk management framework. AUBN's critical weaknesses are its tiny scale, which makes it inefficient and unable to compete on price or technology, and its complete dependence on a small, local economy. The primary risk for AUBN in competing with Regions is customer attrition, as Regions can offer better rates, more products, and a superior digital experience. For an investor, Regions offers stability, income, and quality, whereas AUBN offers a high yield offset by significant fundamental risks.
United Community Banks, Inc. (UCBI) is a successful and growing regional bank with a strong presence across the Southeast, including Florida, Georgia, the Carolinas, and Tennessee. With over $25 billion in assets, UCBI represents a well-run, mid-sized regional bank that has grown effectively through both organic efforts and a disciplined M&A strategy. Comparing UCBI to AUBN highlights the significant performance gap between a sub-scale community bank and a larger, strategically focused regional player that has successfully scaled its operations.
Analyzing Business & Moat, UCBI holds a strong position. Its brand is well-established across several high-growth states, recognized for high-quality customer service (J.D. Power awards). This provides a much wider and more resilient franchise than AUBN's single-market focus. Switching costs are moderate, but UCBI's broader product set and better digital offerings help retain customers. The scale advantage is significant ($25B vs. $1B), enabling UCBI to invest heavily in technology and spread corporate overhead costs over a much larger asset base. UCBI's history of successful acquisitions also constitutes a moat, demonstrating a core competency in integrating other banks to create value, a skill AUBN lacks. Winner: United Community Banks, Inc., for its multi-state scale, strong brand, and proven M&A capabilities.
UCBI's financial statements are demonstrably stronger than AUBN's. UCBI has a consistent track record of revenue growth, driven by a combination of organic loan growth and contributions from acquisitions. Its Net Interest Margin is managed effectively and is typically stable and healthy. The most telling difference is in profitability. UCBI consistently generates a ROAA above 1.2% and an ROAE in the 12-14% range, showcasing efficient and profitable operations that are far superior to AUBN's low single-digit returns. UCBI also maintains a much better efficiency ratio, often in the mid-50% range, compared to AUBN's >75%, meaning UCBI spends far less to generate a dollar of revenue. Winner: United Community Banks, Inc., due to its elite profitability and operational efficiency.
Past performance reinforces UCBI's superior execution. Over the last 5 years, UCBI has delivered consistent EPS growth, supported by its successful acquisition strategy and solid organic performance. This has resulted in a strong TSR for its shareholders, significantly outpacing AUBN's poor returns. On margin trend, UCBI has navigated the interest rate environment adeptly. From a risk perspective, UCBI is far more diversified. Its loan portfolio is spread across multiple states and industries, insulating it from a downturn in any single market. This contrasts with AUBN's high concentration risk. UCBI's credit quality has also been historically strong, reflecting disciplined underwriting. Winner: United Community Banks, Inc., for its consistent growth, strong shareholder returns, and superior risk profile.
UCBI's future growth outlook is very positive. Its primary drivers are continued organic growth in its fast-growing Southeastern footprint (TAM/demand) and its role as a consolidator in the regional banking space (pipeline). The bank has a clear strategy of acquiring smaller banks in attractive markets, which provides a clear path to future earnings growth. It also has an edge in technology, allowing it to compete effectively for younger customers. AUBN, on the other hand, has no clear growth catalysts. Winner: United Community Banks, Inc., for its well-defined and proven multi-pronged growth strategy.
From a valuation standpoint, UCBI trades at a valuation that reflects its quality and consistent performance. Its P/TBV ratio is typically in the 1.5x - 1.8x range, a premium to the industry but justified by its high returns on equity. Its P/E ratio also reflects a high-quality earner. AUBN is cheaper on every metric, but it is a low-quality asset. UCBI's dividend yield is more modest than AUBN's, but it is well-covered and has a history of growth. The quality vs. price argument heavily favors UCBI. Investors are paying a fair price for a reliable, growing, and highly profitable bank, which is a much better proposition than buying a struggling bank at a discount. Winner: United Community Banks, Inc., as its valuation is a fair reflection of its superior operational and financial performance.
Winner: United Community Banks, Inc. over Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. UCBI is the clear winner, exemplifying a well-managed regional bank that is executing a successful growth strategy. Its key strengths are its consistent, high profitability (ROAE ~13%), its disciplined M&A strategy that fuels growth, and its diversified, high-quality franchise across the Southeast. AUBN's defining weaknesses are its lack of scale, poor profitability, and a passive strategy that has left it behind its peers. The primary risk for AUBN is being unable to compete with the superior products, technology, and pricing that better-run banks like UCBI can offer. UCBI represents a high-quality investment in the regional banking space, while AUBN is a micro-cap that has failed to create meaningful shareholder value.
Based on industry classification and performance score:
Auburn National Bancorporation operates a classic community bank model, excelling at gathering stable, low-cost local deposits in its East Alabama market. This strong deposit franchise is its primary competitive advantage. However, the bank is heavily concentrated in its small geographic area and its loan portfolio is overwhelmingly focused on cyclical commercial real estate, creating significant risk. Its limited fee income streams also make it highly dependent on interest rate spreads. The investor takeaway is mixed; while the bank has a solid funding base, its lack of diversification in both geography and business lines presents meaningful vulnerabilities.
The bank's revenue is overly dependent on interest income, with a low contribution from fees that lack diversification beyond basic account and card charges.
Auburn National Bancorporation struggles with revenue diversification. Noninterest income, which comes from fees, made up only 16.7% of its total revenue in the first quarter of 2024. This is below the 20-30% or more that is common for more diversified regional banks. The fee income it does generate comes almost entirely from basic services like debit card fees ($522,000) and service charges on deposit accounts ($343,000). The bank lacks meaningful contributions from more lucrative and stable sources like wealth management or trust services. This heavy reliance on net interest income makes the bank's earnings highly sensitive to changes in interest rates, a significant weakness in its business model.
The bank demonstrates excellent customer diversification within its deposit base, with no reliance on risky brokered deposits and a healthy mix of local sources.
AUBN's deposit base appears well-diversified and low-risk. A key indicator of strength is its complete avoidance of brokered deposits, which contrasts sharply with other banks that have had to turn to these less stable sources for funding. Furthermore, public funds from local municipalities account for a reasonable 12.4% of total deposits, adding another layer of stable, relationship-based funding. While the bank doesn't break down its retail versus business customer mix, the low percentage of uninsured deposits suggests a granular base composed of many smaller accounts rather than a dependency on a few large depositors. This reduces the risk of sudden, large outflows and contributes to the overall stability of its funding, which is a clear positive for the bank's moat.
The bank lacks a true specialized lending niche and instead has a high-risk concentration in commercial real estate, which constitutes over two-thirds of its entire loan portfolio.
Rather than developing a defensible niche, AUBN's lending is heavily concentrated in one of the most cyclical areas of banking: commercial real estate (CRE) and construction loans. These two categories make up a combined 66.5% of its total loan portfolio. While a portion is in less risky owner-occupied CRE (15.8%), the overall exposure is exceptionally high and represents a significant concentration risk, not a strategic focus. Other areas like commercial and industrial (C&I) lending are very small (4.6%) and have been shrinking, declining over 20% year-over-year. This lack of diversification in its lending business is a major vulnerability, as a downturn in the local property market could lead to substantial loan losses.
The bank boasts a strong and stable core deposit base with no brokered deposits and a low level of uninsured funds, providing a significant low-cost funding advantage.
The bank's strength lies in its ability to attract and retain sticky, low-cost local deposits. As of early 2024, noninterest-bearing deposits—funds that customers place in checking accounts that pay no interest—made up 25.1% of total deposits. This is a solid percentage for a community bank and provides a cheap source of funding. More impressively, the bank reported zero brokered deposits, which are typically more expensive and less loyal, and a low uninsured deposit level of 23.8%. This indicates that its funding comes from loyal, local customers rather than hot money chasing high rates. This strong core deposit franchise is a key competitive advantage, lowering its cost of funds and providing stability. The only weakness is a very low annual deposit growth rate of 0.75%, suggesting difficulty in expanding this base.
The bank maintains a small, highly concentrated branch network in East Alabama, giving it deep local scale but exposing it to significant geographic concentration risk.
Auburn National Bancorporation operates a lean network of just 8 branches, all located within its core market in East Alabama. With total deposits of approximately $883 million, this translates to over $110 million in deposits per branch, a solid figure that suggests efficient use of its physical footprint. This density provides a strong local franchise and supports its relationship-based banking model. However, this hyper-local focus is a double-edged sword. While it creates a strong community presence, it also means the bank's entire performance is tied to the economic fortunes of a very small geographic area. Unlike larger regional banks with diversified footprints, a local downturn in employment or real estate could disproportionately harm AUBN. The lack of geographic diversification is a significant structural weakness that overshadows the efficiency of its small network.
Auburn National Bancorporation's financial statements show a mixed picture. The bank demonstrates a key strength in its core lending business, with Net Interest Income growing by 11.5% year-over-year in the most recent quarter. It also maintains a very conservative and liquid balance sheet, evidenced by a low loan-to-deposit ratio of 59.9%. However, profitability is weak, with a Return on Assets of 0.72% falling short of industry peers, and the bank's book value is significantly impacted by unrealized losses on its investment portfolio. The investor takeaway is mixed: the bank is stable and growing its core income, but its low profitability and high interest rate sensitivity are significant concerns.
The bank maintains an exceptionally strong liquidity position with a very low loan-to-deposit ratio, providing a substantial cushion, though key regulatory capital ratios are not provided.
The bank's liquidity is a clear strength. Its loan-to-deposit ratio in Q2 2025 was 59.9%, calculated from 562.71 million in gross loans and 939.85 million in deposits. This is far more conservative than the typical community bank average of 80-90%, indicating that the bank has ample cash-like assets on hand and is not overly stretched on its lending. While critical regulatory capital ratios like CET1 are not provided, we can calculate the Tangible Common Equity to Total Assets ratio. As of Q2 2025, this was 8.36% ($86.07 million / $1,029 million), a solid level. The combination of this equity base and extremely high liquidity suggests the bank is well-positioned to handle financial stress.
Credit quality appears excellent based on extremely low provisions for loan losses and a healthy reserve level, suggesting a very low-risk loan portfolio.
The bank's management appears highly confident in the quality of its loans. The provision for credit losses, which is money set aside for future potential defaults, was minimal at 0.11 million in Q2 2025 and was actually a reversal (a credit) of -0.26 million in Q3 2025. This implies the bank expects better-than-previously-anticipated loan performance. The total allowance for credit losses was 6.97 million in Q2 2025 against a gross loan portfolio of 562.71 million. This results in a reserve coverage ratio of 1.24% of total loans, which is a solid buffer. Although data on actual nonperforming loans and charge-offs is not provided, the consistently low provisions are a strong indicator of a healthy, low-risk loan book.
The bank's balance sheet is highly sensitive to interest rates, with significant unrealized losses on its investment portfolio creating a major drag on its tangible equity.
A major concern for the bank is its exposure to interest rate changes, which is evident in its balance sheet. The 'Comprehensive Income and Other' account, which typically includes unrealized gains or losses on investment securities, showed a negative balance of -$23.31 million as of Q2 2025. This represents a substantial 27% of the bank's tangible book value of $86.07 million. Such a large paper loss suggests that a significant portion of the bank's securities portfolio was purchased when interest rates were lower and has since declined in value. This situation, often referred to as AOCI (Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income) drag, can limit the bank's flexibility to sell these securities and reinvest at higher yields without realizing significant actual losses.
The bank demonstrates a core strength in growing its net interest income, showing it can effectively manage its lending and funding costs in the current rate environment.
Auburn National Bancorporation has shown strong, consistent growth in its primary earnings driver. Net Interest Income (NII), the profit made from lending, grew by an impressive 11.52% year-over-year in Q3 2025 to 7.57 million. This followed a healthy 9.46% growth in the prior quarter. This performance is a positive sign that the bank is successfully increasing the interest it earns on loans and investments faster than the interest it pays on deposits. Although the specific Net Interest Margin (NIM) percentage is not provided, this robust NII growth indicates strong fundamental performance in its core banking operations.
The bank's cost structure is a significant weakness, with an estimated efficiency ratio well above industry benchmarks, which weighs heavily on its overall profitability.
While a specific efficiency ratio is not provided, we can estimate it by comparing noninterest expenses to total revenue. In Q2 2025, noninterest expenses were 5.7 million against revenues (net interest income plus noninterest income) of 8.13 million, yielding an efficiency ratio of 70.1%. For the full fiscal year 2024, the ratio was even higher at 72.5%. These figures are significantly weak compared to the industry benchmark, where a ratio below 60% is considered efficient. This means the bank spends over 70 cents in overhead to generate each dollar of revenue, a high cost that directly suppresses earnings and contributes to its below-average Return on Assets.
Auburn National Bancorporation's past performance has been defined by significant volatility and a lack of consistent growth. While the bank has reliably paid a dividend, its core earnings have been erratic, with Earnings Per Share (EPS) falling from $2.95 in 2022 to just $0.40 in 2023 before a partial recovery. The bank's profitability, measured by Return on Equity, has averaged a modest 7.4% over the last three years, lagging far behind more efficient competitors. Overall, the historical record shows a struggling institution with inconsistent execution, making the investor takeaway negative.
The bank is failing to grow its core business, as evidenced by its shrinking deposit base over the last three years, which is a significant weakness for a community bank.
A review of Auburn National's balance sheet history shows a concerning trend. While gross loans have grown at a compound annual rate of 7.1% over the last three years, this has been overshadowed by a decline in total deposits. Deposits peaked at $994.24 million at the end of 2021 but fell to $895.82 million by the end of 2024. For a community bank, deposits are the lifeblood of the business, providing the low-cost funding needed for lending. A shrinking deposit base suggests the bank is losing market share to competitors who may offer better rates or services.
This divergence has caused the bank's loan-to-deposit ratio to climb from a very low 46.2% in 2021 to 63.0% in 2024. While a higher ratio indicates better use of its funding base, in this case, it reflects a deteriorating funding profile rather than strong, well-managed growth. The inability to grow or even retain core deposits is a fundamental failure that signals deep competitive challenges.
The bank has consistently operated with a high efficiency ratio, indicating poor cost discipline, while its net interest income has remained stagnant, pointing to a lack of competitive strength.
Auburn National has historically struggled with operational efficiency. The efficiency ratio, which measures non-interest expenses as a percentage of revenue, has been poor. Over the last five years, it has often been near or above 70%, and it reached an exceptionally poor 97% in 2023 due to investment losses. For context, strong competitors like ServisFirst operate with efficiency ratios below 40%. This high ratio means AUBN spends far too much to generate each dollar of revenue, leaving little left over for profits.
At the same time, the bank's core revenue engine, net interest income (NII), has failed to grow meaningfully. NII was $24.34 million in 2020 and only grew to $27.13 million by 2024. This minimal growth, especially during a period of rising interest rates that should have benefited banks, suggests weak pricing power on its loans and a competitive disadvantage in its market. The combination of high costs and stagnant revenue is a clear indicator of a poorly performing bank.
The bank's earnings per share have been extremely volatile and have declined over the past five years, demonstrating a clear inability to generate consistent and sustainable profit growth.
The historical earnings track record for Auburn National is poor. Over the five-year period from fiscal 2020 to 2024, earnings per share (EPS) actually declined from $2.09 to $1.83, resulting in a negative compound annual growth rate of -3.2%. The path has been incredibly choppy, with EPS peaking at $2.95 in 2022 before collapsing by 86% to just $0.40 in 2023.
This level of volatility indicates a business model that is not resilient. The bank's profitability, as measured by Return on Equity (ROE), has also been weak, averaging just 7.4% over the last three years. This is substantially below the performance of peer banks like ServisFirst or Southern States Bancshares, which consistently generate much higher returns. This track record does not inspire confidence in management's ability to execute a profitable growth strategy.
The bank's allowance for credit losses has remained stable relative to its loan book, but its extremely low and inconsistent provisioning for these losses raises questions about its conservatism in managing future credit risk.
Auburn National's allowance for credit losses as a percentage of its gross loans has remained stable, hovering around 1.2% over the last few years. However, its method of maintaining this level appears questionable. The bank's annual provision for loan losses—the amount it sets aside from earnings to cover potential bad loans—has been extremely low and erratic. The provision was just $140,000 in 2023 and $40,000 in 2024 on a loan book of over $550 million.
Even more concerning was 2021, when the bank recorded a negative provision of -$0.6 million, which means it released prior reserves to boost its net income for the year. While this can be done if credit quality improves dramatically, it is often viewed as an aggressive accounting move. In an environment of economic uncertainty and higher interest rates, such low provisioning is not conservative and may leave the bank under-reserved if the credit environment worsens. This approach does not reflect disciplined or stable risk management.
The bank has a long record of paying a consistent and slightly growing dividend, but a very high payout ratio in 2023 suggests this return of capital was not supported by earnings and may be at risk during periods of weak performance.
Auburn National has consistently returned capital to shareholders through dividends, with the annual dividend per share inching up from $1.02 in 2020 to $1.08 in 2024. This represents a very modest 1.45% compound annual growth rate. While this consistency is a positive for income-focused investors, the sustainability of the dividend is questionable. In fiscal year 2023, the company's earnings collapsed, causing the dividend payout ratio to spike to an unsustainable 270.68%. This means the dividend was paid from reserves, not from current profits.
Beyond dividends, capital returns have been minimal. The company has engaged in minor share repurchases, reducing its share count by only about 2.2% over the last four years. This level of buybacks is too small to meaningfully boost earnings per share. The bank's primary method of returning capital is its dividend, which, while reliable historically, has been shown to be vulnerable to the company's highly volatile earnings.
Auburn National Bancorporation's future growth outlook is decidedly negative. The bank is fundamentally constrained by its hyper-local focus on East Alabama and an alarming concentration in cyclical commercial real estate loans. While its stable, low-cost deposit base is a strength, stagnant deposit growth and a lack of meaningful fee income streams create significant headwinds. Compared to more diversified regional competitors, AUBN has very few levers to pull for future growth. The investor takeaway is that AUBN is a low-growth, high-risk institution whose most likely path to creating shareholder value is through being acquired, not through organic expansion.
Future loan growth is severely constrained by an excessive concentration in commercial real estate and a shrinking business loan portfolio.
AUBN's path to future loan growth is effectively blocked by its existing portfolio structure. With 66.5% of its loans already in the cyclical commercial real estate sector, adding more would be imprudent from a risk management perspective. Meanwhile, its commercial and industrial (C&I) loan book, a key indicator of lending to local businesses, has been shrinking, falling over 20% year-over-year. Without a strategy to diversify into other lending verticals or evidence of a strong pipeline in healthier segments, the bank has no apparent engine for sustainable, high-quality loan growth.
The bank has no clear strategy for deploying capital to drive growth, making it more of a passive M&A target than a strategic acquirer.
For a bank with limited organic growth prospects, a disciplined capital allocation plan is crucial. However, AUBN has not communicated a clear strategy for using its capital to enhance long-term shareholder value, whether through strategic acquisitions, technology investments, or meaningful share buybacks. The bank's small size and operational concentration make it an unlikely acquirer. Instead, its most compelling future is as a potential acquisition target for a larger bank seeking its stable deposit base. This passive position indicates a lack of proactive management to drive future growth.
The bank has an efficient but geographically concentrated branch network and lacks any discernible digital growth strategy, putting it at a major competitive disadvantage.
Auburn National operates a lean network of just eight branches, which appear efficient with over $110 million in deposits per branch. However, there are no announced plans for further optimization, and more importantly, there is no evidence of a forward-looking digital strategy. In an era where digital adoption is key to attracting and retaining customers, particularly younger demographics, AUBN's lack of investment in its online and mobile platforms is a critical failure. Competitors are winning customers with superior technology, and without a plan to compete on this front, the bank risks slow attrition of its customer base.
Intense competition for deposits and rising funding costs are likely to pressure the bank's net interest margin, with no clear offsets to drive future expansion.
While AUBN has historically benefited from a low-cost core deposit base, this advantage is eroding. The bank's deposit growth has stalled at less than 1%, indicating it is losing the battle for funds against competitors offering higher rates and better digital tools. This will inevitably drive up its cost of funds as customers shift money to higher-yielding accounts. While loan yields may also rise, the pressure on funding costs presents a significant headwind. Management has not provided any guidance suggesting they can expand the net interest margin (NIM) in this environment, making future profit growth from this primary source unlikely.
The bank has a dangerously low level of fee income and no visible plans to develop new revenue streams, leaving it highly exposed to interest rate fluctuations.
Noninterest income accounts for a meager 16.7% of AUBN's total revenue, a figure well below that of more diversified peers. This income is derived from basic services like account fees and debit cards, with no contribution from more scalable and stable sources like wealth management, trust, or treasury services. Management has not announced any targets or initiatives to grow this crucial part of the business. This over-reliance on net interest income is a major strategic weakness, as it makes the bank's earnings highly volatile and vulnerable to changes in the interest rate environment.
As of October 27, 2025, with the stock price at $25.42, Auburn National Bancorporation, Inc. (AUBN) appears to be fairly valued. This conclusion is primarily based on its Price to Tangible Book (P/TBV) ratio of 1.03x, which aligns the stock's price very closely with its tangible book value per share of $24.64. Key metrics supporting this view include a solid 10.35% Return on Equity (ROE) and a healthy 4.25% dividend yield, which are reasonable for a community bank. For investors, this suggests a neutral takeaway; the stock is not a clear bargain but is priced rationally according to its fundamental asset value and profitability.
The stock trades almost exactly at its tangible book value per share, a primary indicator of fair valuation for a bank.
For banks, the Price to Tangible Book (P/TBV) ratio is a critical valuation metric. AUBN's tangible book value per share as of the most recent quarter is $24.64. With a stock price of $25.42, the P/TBV ratio is 1.03x. This is a strong indicator of fair value, as investors are paying a price that is almost identical to the bank's tangible net worth. The bank's Return on Equity (ROE) of 10.35% justifies this multiple. The industry average P/B ratio for regional banks is around 1.11x to 1.15x, placing AUBN slightly below its peers and reinforcing that it is not overpriced relative to its assets. This close alignment between market price and asset value warrants a pass.
The bank's Price to Book ratio is rationally aligned with its Return on Equity, suggesting the market is pricing its profitability fairly.
A key test for bank valuation is whether the Price to Book (P/B) multiple is justified by its Return on Equity (ROE). AUBN's P/B ratio is 1.03x (since tangible book and book are the same) and its most recent ROE is 10.35%. A general rule of thumb is that a bank earning an ROE close to its cost of equity (often estimated between 9-12%) should trade around its book value. AUBN fits this profile perfectly. Community banks reported an average ROE of 9.99% in late 2024, which puts AUBN's performance right in line with its peers. This alignment between profitability and valuation indicates a rational market price and supports a "Pass" for this factor.
The stock's P/E ratio is in line with industry averages and not indicative of a discount, while future growth is not clearly defined.
The company's P/E ratio (TTM) is 12.42x, which is aligned with the regional banking industry average of approximately 11.7x-13.5x. While not overvalued, it does not signal a clear bargain on an earnings basis. The recent quarterly EPS growth of 28.58% is strong, but there are no forward-looking estimates provided (Forward PE is 0), making it difficult to assess sustainable, long-term growth. Without a clear indication of future growth to suggest the P/E ratio is low relative to prospects (i.e., a low PEG ratio), this factor does not point to undervaluation. Therefore, it fails the test for being a compelling value proposition based on this specific check.
The stock offers a strong and sustainable dividend yield, which provides a significant income stream for shareholders.
Auburn National Bancorporation provides a compelling income proposition for investors. Its dividend yield is 4.25%, which is notably higher than the average for regional banks (around 3.31%). This high yield is supported by a reasonable payout ratio of 52.77%, indicating that the dividend is well-covered by earnings and is not at immediate risk. The annual dividend is $1.08 per share. While the company has not engaged in significant share repurchases recently (the buybackYieldDilution is a negligible -0.02%), the strength of the dividend alone justifies a pass in this category for income-focused investors.
On a relative basis, AUBN's valuation multiples are in line with industry peers, not at a significant discount.
When compared to its peers in the regional and community banking sector, AUBN does not stand out as clearly undervalued. Its P/E (TTM) of 12.42x is consistent with the industry average (~11.7x-13.5x). Its Price/Tangible Book ratio of 1.03x is slightly below the peer average of around 1.1x-1.5x, but not low enough to represent a deep discount, especially given its corresponding ROE. While its dividend yield of 4.25% is attractive and above the regional bank average of ~3.3%, the overall valuation picture is one of alignment with the market, not a distinct bargain. For a pass in this category, the stock would need to show a clearer discount across multiple metrics.
The primary risk facing Auburn National Bancorporation stems from macroeconomic factors, particularly interest rate fluctuations and economic cycles. Like all banks, AUBN's core profitability comes from its net interest margin—the difference between the interest it earns on loans and what it pays for deposits. In a rising rate environment, margins can expand, but it also increases the risk of loan defaults as borrowers struggle with higher payments. Looking ahead, a potential economic slowdown or recession poses a significant threat. Such a downturn would likely lead to higher credit losses, especially within its commercial loan portfolio, and reduce demand for new loans, directly impacting revenue and profitability.
On an industry level, the banking sector is fiercely competitive. AUBN faces a multi-front battle against larger, national banks that possess massive technological and marketing budgets, and innovative fintech companies that are capturing market share with user-friendly digital products. To stay relevant, AUBN must invest in its own technology, such as mobile banking and online services, but its smaller scale (~$1.0 billion in total assets) makes it difficult to match the research and development spending of its larger rivals. This creates a persistent risk of being outpaced technologically. Additionally, the banking industry is subject to stringent regulations. Any new compliance requirements could disproportionately increase costs for a smaller institution like AUBN compared to its larger peers.
Company-specific risks are centered on its concentrated operational footprint. AUBN's business is almost entirely dependent on the Auburn-Opelika metropolitan statistical area in Alabama. While this allows for deep community ties, it also creates a significant vulnerability. A localized economic shock, such as a major local employer facing trouble or a decline in the economic activity generated by Auburn University, would have a much more severe impact on AUBN than on a geographically diversified bank. This concentration limits its growth avenues and exposes its loan portfolio and deposit base to the fortunes of a single regional economy. While its balance sheet appears conservatively managed, this lack of diversification remains its key structural challenge moving forward.
Click a section to jump